d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Science, Technology & Nature > Curiosity Found Something For The "history Books" > Maybe Signs Of Life In Mars' Past?
12Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 11,446
Joined: Feb 19 2006
Gold: 1,706.36
Nov 20 2012 06:40pm
http://www.npr.org/2012/11/20/165513016/big-news-from-mars-rover-scientists-mum-for-now


Apparently, curiosity's SAM (Chemistry lab) seems to have found something great, but they aren't saying what yet since they want to make sure it is right.

Hope it is signs of life

Member
Posts: 13,578
Joined: Jul 27 2010
Gold: 2,285.00
Nov 20 2012 07:15pm
Science has had a pretty good year so far. Physics had the Higgs Boson, and now either Biology or Chemistry might be getting something equally monumental.
Member
Posts: 40,915
Joined: Jul 8 2009
Gold: 0.00
Nov 20 2012 08:24pm
Quote (bentherdonethat @ Nov 20 2012 07:15pm)
Science has had a pretty good year so far. Physics had the Higgs Boson, and now either Biology or Chemistry might be getting something equally monumental.


Biology already got his, but we'll happily take another!

Quote
NEW YORK — Two scientists from different generations won the Nobel Prize in medicine Monday for the groundbreaking discovery that cells in the body can be reprogrammed into completely different kinds, work that reflects the mechanism behind cloning and offers an alternative to using embryonic stem cells.


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/10/08/nobel-prize-john-gurdon-shinya-yamanaka-stem-cell_n_1947689.html
Member
Posts: 80,637
Joined: Mar 25 2006
Gold: 3,188.50
Nov 20 2012 08:27pm
BAH i wanna know so bad lol
Member
Posts: 1,586
Joined: Oct 30 2011
Gold: 0.00
Nov 20 2012 08:55pm
Quote (piddywiffle @ Nov 20 2012 09:24pm)


+AIDS progress + Alzheimer's progress et cetera
Member
Posts: 40,915
Joined: Jul 8 2009
Gold: 0.00
Nov 20 2012 11:52pm
Quote (QQQQQQQQQQQ @ Nov 20 2012 08:55pm)
+AIDS progress + Alzheimer's progress et cetera


Definitely.

The possibilities from that technology are massive.

I can't wait to see where the rabbit hole goes.
Member
Posts: 13,578
Joined: Jul 27 2010
Gold: 2,285.00
Nov 21 2012 07:14am
Quote (piddywiffle @ Nov 20 2012 10:24pm)

Nope, induced pluripotent stem cells were discovered like 5-6 years ago. You never, EVER get the Nobel Prize in the same year you make the discovery ;)
Member
Posts: 40,915
Joined: Jul 8 2009
Gold: 0.00
Nov 21 2012 09:43am
Quote (bentherdonethat @ Nov 21 2012 07:14am)
Nope, induced pluripotent stem cells were discovered like 5-6 years ago. You never, EVER get the Nobel Prize in the same year you make the discovery ;)


Ah!

But science only recognizes it when the results are in conclusively!

And don't you try to take my two in one year away from me sir! I will fight you with my cat like nails >:3
Member
Posts: 13,578
Joined: Jul 27 2010
Gold: 2,285.00
Nov 21 2012 03:40pm
Quote (piddywiffle @ Nov 21 2012 11:43am)
Ah!

But science only recognizes it when the results are in conclusively!

And don't you try to take my two in one year away from me sir!  I will fight you with my cat like nails >:3

The results were in conclusively back then, too. It's just that so many discoveries are made so often that no one ever wins the Nobel Prize right when they make the conclusive discovery. Einstein didn't win his Nobel Prize until 1922 (though he has the 1921 award because none of the nominees in 1921 were chosen so they gave 2 out the following year), even though his paper about the photoelectric effect (and relativity, brownian motion, etc) was published in 1905.

But that's one of the greatest parts about science, really. Every year we're pushing the boundaries farther and farther. It's kind of cool that we don't have enough awards to keep up with the rate of new discoveries, isn't it? Every year there are things in every branch of science that has the ability to radically change the world and our understanding of it.
Member
Posts: 40,915
Joined: Jul 8 2009
Gold: 0.00
Nov 22 2012 11:03am
Quote (bentherdonethat @ Nov 21 2012 03:40pm)
The results were in conclusively back then, too. It's just that so many discoveries are made so often that no one ever wins the Nobel Prize right when they make the conclusive discovery. Einstein didn't win his Nobel Prize until 1922 (though he has the 1921 award because none of the nominees in 1921 were chosen so they gave 2 out the following year), even though his paper about the photoelectric effect (and relativity, brownian motion, etc) was published in 1905.

But that's one of the greatest parts about science, really. Every year we're pushing the boundaries farther and farther. It's kind of cool that we don't have enough awards to keep up with the rate of new discoveries, isn't it? Every year there are things in every branch of science that has the ability to radically change the world and our understanding of it.


Definitely so dude.

But I must remind you that if you attempted to alter my perception of a two in one year, then I would accost you with my cat like nails.

You were warned:

Go Back To Science, Technology & Nature Topic List
12Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll