Quote (piddywiffle @ Jul 12 2012 05:29am)
I'm not sure you grabbed the idea I was putting out, so I'll rephrase it a little bit and see what you think of that.
We're changing the game with modern medicine.
By going against what the universe says about genetics that would have normally been selected against via Natural Selection, we are indeed artifically selecting for the genes.
Granted, we are not doing it for the gene itself. Instead we see an ethics based method of selection that we cling to in an effort to keep our family alive for an extended period of time.
These ethics cause harmful genes to remain in the gene pool if the afflicted individual survives long enough to reproduce, which in many instances, would have not been the case had we allowed it to be dictated by nature alone.
im not sure you grasp my very simple point
your " harmful genes " are only harmful in an environment that selects against it
we dont live in a world without medicine , therefore we dont live in an environment that selects against your " harmful genes "
and unless you foresee a future in which medicine has vanished , those genes will not be selected against , and will continue in the gene pool
natural selection working just fine , as we continue to adapt to our actual current environment , not one we lived in thousands of years ago