d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Science, Technology & Nature > Claim Of Universe Existing Before Big Bang
12Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 5,853
Joined: May 31 2009
Gold: 22.00
Warn: 20%
Jun 13 2012 09:01am
My question is how the fuck do people know exactly when the Big Bang happened and what is their foundation/proof behind their "theories" ?
Member
Posts: 416
Joined: Mar 4 2012
Gold: 0.00
Jun 13 2012 09:48am
Quote (chewbacha @ Jun 13 2012 10:01am)
My question is how the fuck do people know exactly when the Big Bang happened and what is their foundation/proof behind their "theories" ?


Obviously we can't know exactly, but by using physics and based on the size of the universe and how fast it's moving, we can essentially trace time backwards and make an estimate.
Member
Posts: 15,114
Joined: Nov 18 2005
Gold: 89,176.00
Jun 13 2012 10:08am
Quote
The researcher shows that the cosmic radiation background (CMB) formed in concentric circles that had cooled to a temperature of -270C over the 14 million years since the universe came into being.


I don't know if I trust this article.

This post was edited by taekvideo on Jun 13 2012 10:08am
Member
Posts: 38,137
Joined: May 28 2006
Gold: 0.00
Jun 13 2012 10:30am
Quote (chewbacha @ Jun 13 2012 05:01pm)
My question is how the fuck do people know exactly when the Big Bang happened and what is their foundation/proof behind their "theories" ?


cosmic background radiation
Member
Posts: 40,915
Joined: Jul 8 2009
Gold: 0.00
Jun 13 2012 04:08pm
Ehhhh....

The article isn't very revealing and the blanket statements they use are pretty indicative of a very invalid method of data collection.

It's a neat thought and is one for further exploration. I just don't think it should have been revealed at this stage of research.
Member
Posts: 80,637
Joined: Mar 25 2006
Gold: 3,188.50
Jun 13 2012 05:30pm
Quote (taekvideo @ Jun 13 2012 11:08am)
I don't know if I trust this article.


reading this post made me not even want to read the link lol
Member
Posts: 20,461
Joined: Jun 16 2008
Gold: 722.53
Warn: 10%
Jun 13 2012 05:59pm
Quote (piddywiffle @ Jun 13 2012 04:08pm)
Ehhhh....

The article isn't very revealing and the blanket statements they use are pretty indicative of a very invalid method of data collection.

It's a neat thought and is one for further exploration.  I just don't think it should have been revealed at this stage of research.


I hope you don't trust an article to prove that there was an invalid method of data collection with the studies it references.
Member
Posts: 23,551
Joined: Jul 3 2008
Gold: 3,479.67
Jun 13 2012 06:34pm
interesting... ive always liked Penrose...

Quote (taekvideo @ Jun 13 2012 04:08pm)
I don't know if I trust this article.



and it says 14 billion years... guy..
Member
Posts: 40,915
Joined: Jul 8 2009
Gold: 0.00
Jun 13 2012 06:50pm
Quote (AEtheric @ Jun 13 2012 05:59pm)
I hope you don't trust an article to prove that there was an invalid method of data collection with the studies it references.


I didn't.

I'm not going to say much more about it until I see a reliable report on it.
Go Back To Science, Technology & Nature Topic List
12Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll