d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Science, Technology & Nature > The Big Bang (my Question) > Lmk
12Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 9,723
Joined: Mar 4 2010
Gold: Locked
Trader: Scammer
Warn: 10%
Aug 3 2011 04:36pm
So if the universe was @ 1 single super compressed point, then it exploded and created the universe we have here today,
Wouldnt all the matter shot out of the super compressed point all be going away from each other and never have the possibility of intersection?

This video @ 1:48


www.youtube.com/watch%3Fv%3DkkGeOWYOFoA


does it make sense or not? im sure this question has already been answered, i just havent found the answer.
Member
Posts: 16,181
Joined: Jun 11 2006
Gold: 24,441.00
Aug 3 2011 04:50pm
i would guess that colision of matter and gravational pull from mass of large objects effect the movement

the theory isnt that matter did a completely perfect spherical nova; im sure that it was no where near a flawless explosion.
Member
Posts: 13,578
Joined: Jul 27 2010
Gold: 2,285.00
Aug 3 2011 05:45pm
If the universe had expanded with a uniform mass distribution, yes, it never would have "intersected" as you put it. Pockets of gas wouldn't have separated themselves out from each other because there would be equal gravitational forces in all directions. However, because there was NOT a uniform mass distribution, the gases were more pulled in some directions than they were in others, and so eventually the matter separated itself into galaxies.

If that didn't answer your question, let me know. the URL didn't create a link and I'm short on time atm so I didn't have the time to fool around with it.
Member
Posts: 42,313
Joined: Apr 2 2008
Gold: 90.65
Warn: 50%
Aug 3 2011 09:32pm
Quote (Tummy @ Aug 4 2011 10:36am)
So if the universe was @ 1 single super compressed point, then it exploded and created the universe we have here today,
Wouldnt all the matter shot out of the super compressed point all be going away from each other and never have the possibility of intersection?

This video @ 1:48


www.youtube.com/watch%3Fv%3DkkGeOWYOFoA


does it make sense or not? im sure this question has already been answered, i just havent found the answer.


1st , there was no matter in the " big bang "
matter was created later

2nd , the distribution was not uniform (if it was , you would be right , and gravity would have been equal everywhere , and no clumping of matter would have occured )
Member
Posts: 33,925
Joined: Oct 9 2008
Gold: 2,528.52
Aug 3 2011 10:47pm
Quote (Tummy @ Aug 3 2011 06:36pm)
So if the universe was @ 1 single super compressed point, then it exploded and created the universe we have here today,
Wouldnt all the matter shot out of the super compressed point all be going away from each other and never have the possibility of intersection?

This video @ 1:48


www.youtube.com/watch%3Fv%3DkkGeOWYOFoA


does it make sense or not? im sure this question has already been answered, i just havent found the answer.


nice sig
Member
Posts: 1,854
Joined: Jul 26 2011
Gold: 0.01
Warn: 90%
Aug 6 2011 08:00am
Quote (Tummy @ Aug 3 2011 06:36pm)
So if the universe was @ 1 single super compressed point, then it exploded and created the universe we have here today,
Wouldnt all the matter shot out of the super compressed point all be going away from each other and never have the possibility of intersection?

This video @ 1:48


www.youtube.com/watch%3Fv%3DkkGeOWYOFoA


does it make sense or not? im sure this question has already been answered, i just havent found the answer.


What if the big bang was really only a single gigantic star that went supernova?

and our universe is only one of billions of those?
Member
Posts: 24,488
Joined: Jul 11 2011
Gold: 1,272.50
Aug 6 2011 08:42am
Quote (Matao @ Aug 3 2011 08:32pm)
1st , there was no matter in the " big bang "
matter was created later

2nd , the distribution was not uniform  (if it was , you would be right , and gravity would have been equal everywhere , and no clumping of matter would have occured )


this
Member
Posts: 40,631
Joined: Nov 27 2007
Gold: 18,151.00
Aug 6 2011 04:30pm
Quote (Matao @ Aug 3 2011 11:32pm)
1st , there was no matter in the " big bang "
matter was created later

2nd , the distribution was not uniform  (if it was , you would be right , and gravity would have been equal everywhere , and no clumping of matter would have occured )


something exploded therefore you could call what exploded "matter", even if its not the same matter or in the same form as the matter we see today


matter randomly appearing out of nowhere from nothing is ridiculous

This post was edited by Wyrmvater on Aug 6 2011 04:30pm
Member
Posts: 13,578
Joined: Jul 27 2010
Gold: 2,285.00
Aug 6 2011 08:10pm
Quote (Wyrmvater @ Aug 6 2011 06:30pm)
something exploded therefore you could call what exploded "matter", even if its not the same matter or in the same form as the matter we see today


matter randomly appearing out of nowhere from nothing is ridiculous

It's more accurate to say mass-energy than matter. Anyone who would make a claim that there was nothing and then it exploded does not have an accurate understanding of the Big Bang theory.
Member
Posts: 16,750
Joined: Jul 14 2007
Gold: 27,604.25
Aug 6 2011 10:30pm
Quote (Wyrmvater @ Aug 7 2011 12:30am)
something exploded therefore you could call what exploded "matter", even if its not the same matter or in the same form as the matter we see today


matter randomly appearing out of nowhere from nothing is ridiculous


first lets answer this: in a pure vacuum matter appears and disappears continously.

when the big bang occured (some 13 billion years ago approximately) the universe as we know it was created, what we have to understand, wich i admit is VERY hard is that space did not even exist before that, it was a zero dimensional space.
in the big bang it was matter and anti-matter that appeared (the building blocks of neutrons and positrons etc etc) the smallest imaginable matter. first was the "inflation" of the universe wich appeared at a far higher speed than the speed of light, imagine something that is smaller than an atom blowing up to the size of milkyway in matter of seconds, what we can see of the universe is only a small fraction of how big it really is, 13 billion light years in <--that direction and 13 billion light years in --> that direction, well all directions.

Some trivia at the end, i couldnt help myself

now this is not so easy to understand, the space we live in is very strange in some senses.
for example how much matter it is in an atom compared the space it occupies, if we take all neutrons and positrons from every living human being on earth and we put them next to eachother in a small ball, it would be no bigger than an apple, or a tennis ball. it would still have the same mass. (still not a black hole) if we would take earth and compress it to a black hole its event horizon would be 15centimeters across
Go Back To Science, Technology & Nature Topic List
12Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll