d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Science, Technology & Nature > Japan: Nuclear Crisis Raised To Chernobyl Level
12Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Banned
Posts: 17,960
Joined: Dec 6 2010
Gold: 2.11
Warn: 60%
Banned
Posts: 17,960
Joined: Dec 6 2010
Gold: 2.11
Warn: 60%
Apr 12 2011 12:52am
Japanese authorities have raised the severity rating of their nuclear crisis to the highest level, seven.

The decision reflects the total release of radiation at the damaged Fukushima Daiichi power plant, which is ongoing, rather than a sudden deterioration.

Level seven previously only applied to the 1986 Chernobyl disaster, where 10 times as much radiation was emitted.

Meanwhile a 6.0-magnitude earthquake on Tuesday prompted the plant's operator to evacuate its staff.

Tokyo Electric Power Co (Tepco) said it was checking the status of the plant after the quake, the second to hit in as many days, but said there had been no reports of problems with external power.

The aftershocks come a month after a huge quake and tsunami hit north-east Japan, leaving 13,219 people dead and 14,274 missing. More than 150,000 people have been made homeless.

Impact of leaks
An official from the Nuclear Safety Commission of Japan announced that the crisis level at the Fukushima Daiichi plant was being raised in a televised statement, adding that it was a preliminary assessment that was subject to confirmation by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).

The level seven signifies a "major accident" with "wider consequences" than the previous level, officials say.

"We have upgraded the severity level to seven as the impact of radiation leaks has been widespread from the air, vegetables, tap water and the ocean," said Minoru Oogoda of Japan's Nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency (Nisa), the government's nuclear watchdog.

One official from Tepco said that radiation leaks had not stopped completely and could eventually exceed those at Chernobyl, Reuters news agency reported.

However, a nuclear safety agency spokesman told reporters the leaks were still small compared to those at the plant in Ukraine, then part of the Soviet Union.

"In terms of volume of radioactive materials released, our estimate shows it is about 10% of what was released by Chernobyl," he said.

The decision to raise the threat level was made after radiation of up to 630,000 terabequerels per hour had been estimated at the stricken plant for several hours.

That would classify the crisis at level seven on the International Nuclear and Radiological Event Scale (Ines).

It was not clear when that level had been reached. The level has subsequently dropped to less than one terabequerel an hour, reports said.

In comparison the Japanese government said the release from Chernobyl was 5.2 million terabecquerels.

Evacuations extended
The severity level of Japan's nuclear crisis had previously been set at five, the same as that of the accident at Three Mile Island in the US in 1979.


apan has also said it is extending the evacuation zone around the crippled nuclear plant because of radiation concerns.

The zone will be widened to encompass five communities beyond the existing 20-km (12-mile) radius, following new data about accumulated radiation levels, officials said.

Japan's nuclear commission said that according to preliminary results, the cumulative level of external radiation exceeded the yearly limit of 1 millisievert in areas extending more than 60km (36 miles) to the north-west of the plant and about 40km to the south-southwest.

On Monday, a 7.1-magnitude quake hit north-east Japan, leaving three people dead. It also triggered a brief tsunami warning, and forced workers to evacuate the Fukushima Daiichi plant.

Tuesday's quake rocked buildings in the capital, Tokyo.

There were no immediate reports of fresh damage, though Japan's Narita international airport temporarily closed its runways, and metro and train services were interrupted.

The cooling systems at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant were damaged in last month's disaster and workers have been struggling to prevent several reactors from overheating.

Officials have warned it will be several months before the situation at the nuclear facility is brought fully under control.

Tepco said on Tuesday that a fire had broken out briefly at Reactor 4, before being extinguished.
Member
Posts: 5,901
Joined: Dec 13 2005
Gold: 2,508.53
Apr 12 2011 01:12am
That isn't Chernobyl!

It is still way past the need, to give up and isolate it.

Meaning, go crazy, toss in tons of liquid nitrogen, then lead and then bury it in massive tons of dirt.

That is more first thought tentative. I know people in Oak Ridge have more details.

They defiantly waited too long, trying to save the plant for further use.

My wife has a friend from Fukushima, that left quickly we are still looking for. :/
Banned
Posts: 17,960
Joined: Dec 6 2010
Gold: 2.11
Warn: 60%
Apr 12 2011 01:27am
Quote (WhirlingDervish @ Apr 12 2011 02:12am)
That isn't Chernobyl!

It is still way past the need, to give up and isolate it.

Meaning, go crazy, toss in tons of liquid nitrogen, then lead and then bury it in massive tons of dirt.

That is more first thought tentative. I know people in Oak Ridge have more details.

They defiantly waited too long, trying to save the plant for further use.

My wife has a friend from Fukushima, that left quickly we are still looking for. :/



i really think they are just fighting a loosing battle
Member
Posts: 3,720
Joined: Mar 16 2011
Gold: 13,003.00
Apr 12 2011 01:52am
:angry:
Member
Posts: 13,578
Joined: Jul 27 2010
Gold: 2,285.00
Apr 12 2011 01:55am
Has anyone else noticed that the proposed ways of dealing with the Fukushima reactors are oddly reminiscent of the ways BP tried to deal with the Gulf oil spill before they finally got the relief wells dug?
Banned
Posts: 17,960
Joined: Dec 6 2010
Gold: 2.11
Warn: 60%
Apr 12 2011 01:56am
Quote (bentherdonethat @ Apr 12 2011 02:55am)
Has anyone else noticed that the proposed ways of dealing with the Fukushima reactors are oddly reminiscent of the ways BP tried to deal with the Gulf oil spill before they finally got the relief wells dug?


no i had not noticed that
Member
Posts: 5,901
Joined: Dec 13 2005
Gold: 2,508.53
Apr 12 2011 02:16am
Quote (jasondrooney @ Apr 12 2011 03:27am)
i really think they are just fighting a loosing battle


I was saying the same because they were trying to hold onto it like it will be a viable plant again.

Quote (bentherdonethat @ Apr 12 2011 03:55am)
Has anyone else noticed that the proposed ways of dealing with the Fukushima reactors are oddly reminiscent of the ways BP tried to deal with the Gulf oil spill before they finally got the relief wells dug?


... and after!

It's all self-centered pipe-dreams!

Media seems to be downplaying the Gulf spill now. Gotta go with ratings right? Ratings are reality? O_o

Who is gonna drill in our gulf and sell us oil again? O_o
Member
Posts: 13,578
Joined: Jul 27 2010
Gold: 2,285.00
Apr 12 2011 02:59am
Quote (jasondrooney @ Apr 12 2011 03:56am)
no i had not noticed that

One of the first things I heard them suggest was a big-ass concrete containment dome. The next was basically filling it up with heavy mud and golf balls (this one was Top Kill, but I forget if the other one had a project name).
Member
Posts: 12,036
Joined: Sep 9 2010
Gold: 75.00
Apr 12 2011 07:53am
I think journalists exaggerating situation. Engineers and sciencist know what to do.
Go Back To Science, Technology & Nature Topic List
12Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll