d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Science, Technology & Nature > A Theory On Child Genetics
12Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 3,588
Joined: Jul 5 2008
Gold: 0.33
Jul 21 2010 10:23pm
I noticed today that the youngest children of a family often look more like their mother rather than their father.
I thought of a few other youngest children of their respective families and realized that they almost always look more like their mother.

My theory, though it might sound a little weird, is that the older the father is when the child is had, the less the child will look like him. Why?
His sperm.
Wouldn't it make sense? Sperm gets weaker as you age. The older you are when you impregnate a female, the less likely your sperm are going to be able to pass on your genes because they're weaker.

Alert the media. Not sure if this is already a well-known fact or if I'm just imagining the youngest children looking more similar to the father, but it is something to think about.
Member
Posts: 26,493
Joined: May 1 2008
Gold: 993.00
Jul 21 2010 10:27pm
i think it has something to do with multiple pregnancy's , partly hence the stigma of the firstborn being the cream of the crop
Member
Posts: 45,881
Joined: Jan 18 2009
Gold: 105.00
Jul 21 2010 10:30pm
My little brother looks identical to my dad when he was the same age.
Member
Posts: 32,985
Joined: Mar 17 2005
Gold: 6.00
Jul 21 2010 10:47pm
never made a punnett square of genetic traits?
Member
Posts: 4,725
Joined: Jul 19 2010
Gold: Locked
Trader: Scammer
Jul 22 2010 02:42am
ill get back to you in 10 years dad just had a kid and hes 52
Member
Posts: 20,253
Joined: Apr 30 2008
Gold: 5,267.97
Jul 22 2010 05:27am
just because the sperm is weaker, doesn't mean that the genes contained in it are weaker. once the sperm reaches the egg, the sperm's "weakness" is completely irrelevant, since the genes simply merge and form a now, coincidental combination of the two genes, which is completely unrelated to how strong or weak the sperm/egg are
Member
Posts: 9,899
Joined: May 7 2006
Gold: 550.00
Jul 22 2010 12:33pm
This is just sillyness. You get two sets of DNA, one from each parent. One allele doesn't become dominant because the sperm is aging, that would mean the genetic code is decaying, which would doom humanity.
Member
Posts: 3,588
Joined: Jul 5 2008
Gold: 0.33
Jul 22 2010 02:11pm
Quote (Viona @ Jul 22 2010 06:27am)
just because the sperm is weaker, doesn't mean that the genes contained in it are weaker. once the sperm reaches the egg, the sperm's "weakness" is completely irrelevant, since the genes simply merge and form a now, coincidental combination of the two genes, which is completely unrelated to how strong or weak the sperm/egg are

No evidence, just a random claim.

Quote (Sioux @ Jul 22 2010 01:33pm)
This is just sillyness. You get two sets of DNA, one from each parent. One allele doesn't become dominant because the sperm is aging, that would mean the genetic code is decaying, which would doom humanity.


No, my idea is that the genetic code is still there, it just can't be picked up as easily.

This post was edited by lagunalight on Jul 22 2010 02:11pm
Member
Posts: 4,228
Joined: May 20 2005
Gold: 55.00
Jul 23 2010 09:06am
sorry but you are wacked.... eggs, well women get so many and as they get to the bottom of the pile they are rotten....sperm on the other hand, is not stored longer than 30 days and new sperm is created, men always produce stronger traits for this reason. women and their reproductive traits will always be weaker.
Member
Posts: 6,457
Joined: Mar 12 2007
Gold: 6,745.00
Jul 23 2010 01:24pm
Uh.... i think you need to take a middle school biology class. You get half the genes from you mother and half from your father.
Go Back To Science, Technology & Nature Topic List
12Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll