Don't have to watch the video.
Care to discuss anyways?

it's not devolving if we have no disadvantages

i would hope not.

There's no such thing as 'devolution'.

Now, 'Intelligent Annihilation', on the other hand...

This post was edited by Aliengames on Jun 4 2010 02:30pm

to be fair to myself, I did not say "devolution"
the word was devolving.(I'd imagine this an act of a species generally not evolving to a better form)

what?

there is no such thing as devolving. yes i think we are still evolving.

seriously?

Would you better understand a phrase of words?
Is our species evolutionary focus being manipulated or frozen towards a negative impact on the future of man-kind?
Seriously, how can you just not accept the word if you clearly understand it.

fuck you. shit sorry meant to raise my middle finger not my index finger. I'm sure you get the point though.

seriously?

rage

/e I don't think we're 'devolving' as technology makes things easier, we're expanding into more difficult fields at the same time.
the comparisons in that video were stupid

This post was edited by majorblood on Jun 4 2010 07:55pm

doesn't exhist. you can't technicaly de-evolve that would require going back in time

but yes things can evolve back to how they used to be if the right conditions are presented for long periods of time.


Good song btw.

This post was edited by Chinlc on Jun 5 2010 04:23pm

my only point was that devolving and devolution suggest the exact same thing. nice rage kid. just a reminder, this is the science forum.

to be clear: a species cannot "devolve" or go backwards in evolution. if you are asking if we are less athletic, then yes. but ever smarter, yes.

This post was edited by juliusjuice on Jun 5 2010 08:40pm