Quote (WWumpscut @ Jan 7 2010 06:14pm)
Olny 55% can raed tihs I cdnuolt blveiee taht I cluod aulaclty uesdnatnrd waht I was rdanieg. The phaonmneal pweor of the hmuan
mnid, aoccdrnig to a rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it dseno't mtaetr in waht oerdr the ltteres in a wrod are, the olny iproamtnt tihng
is taht the frsit and lsat ltteer be in the rghit pclae. The rset can be a taotl mses and you can sitll raed it whotuit a pboerlm. Tihs is
bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe. Azanmig huh?yaeh and I awlyas tghuhot slpeling was
ipmorantt! fi yuo cna raed tihs, palce it in yuor porfiel
This is a completely useless topic. Since a large portion of words in sentences only compose of 3 to 4 letters, you don't swap much there to make it understandable. The longer words are gotten out of context, rather than out of their letters.
Examples without context:
otastunidg == ?????
dbleesnhsitmashit == ????