d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Science, Technology & Nature > White Hole > ==
12Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 9,150
Joined: May 11 2009
Gold: 5.01
May 11 2009 12:42am
Can someone explain what a white hole is to me?
Banned
Posts: 6,193
Joined: May 7 2009
Gold: Locked
Trader: Scammer
Warn: 70%
May 11 2009 01:12am
opposite of a black hole
Member
Posts: 2,042
Joined: Jul 3 2006
Gold: 1.04
May 11 2009 06:21am
Quote (RedFromWinter @ Mon, May 11 2009, 06:42am)
Can someone explain what a white hole is to me?


It is the same exact thing as a black hole -- a white hole was only a theoretical reversal of the properties of a black hole when it was first thought up, and thus scientists said that it too had immense gravitational pull like a black hole (gravity would not reverse in this case), but instead of sucking in matter it would eject it at the event horizon. However Hawking proved that blackholes emit radiation at its event horizon as well and thus lose mass. Therefore upon death of a black hole, it would emit any remaining matter that it had engulfed in the form of radiation. Therefore he proved that the mathematical reversal of a black hole was indeed just a black hole.
Member
Posts: 20,217
Joined: Mar 20 2007
Gold: 431.00
May 12 2009 05:22pm
Quote (BovineDesi @ Mon, May 11 2009, 06:21am)
It is the same exact thing as a black hole -- a white hole was only a theoretical reversal of the properties of a black hole when it was first thought up, and thus scientists said that it too had immense gravitational pull like a black hole (gravity would not reverse in this case), but instead of sucking in matter it would eject it at the event horizon. However Hawking proved that blackholes emit radiation at its event horizon as well and thus lose mass. Therefore upon death of a black hole, it would emit any remaining matter that it had engulfed in the form of radiation. Therefore he proved that the mathematical reversal of a black hole was indeed just a black hole.



Hawking is pretty much the shit.

Member
Posts: 2,664
Joined: Apr 29 2009
Gold: 255.00
May 14 2009 12:10am
Quote (general_patton @ Tue, May 12 2009, 03:22pm)
Hawking is pretty much the shit.


yeah what a crazy mother fucker.
Member
Posts: 14,659
Joined: Jan 27 2007
Gold: 78.16
May 14 2009 04:20am
Quote (general_patton @ Wed, May 13 2009, 09:22am)
Hawking is pretty much the shit.


Id let him analyze my brown hole
Member
Posts: 10,459
Joined: Apr 21 2007
Gold: 11,010.00
May 14 2009 06:33am
Quote (lithfkn @ Thu, May 14 2009, 10:20am)
Id let him analyze my brown hole


i wont
Member
Posts: 14,659
Joined: Jan 27 2007
Gold: 78.16
May 14 2009 06:59am
Quote (hk_nobody @ Thu, May 14 2009, 10:33pm)
i wont


feels good man
Member
Posts: 9,150
Joined: May 11 2009
Gold: 5.01
May 17 2009 10:48pm
Quote (BovineDesi @ Mon, May 11 2009, 07:21am)
It is the same exact thing as a black hole -- a white hole was only a theoretical reversal of the properties of a black hole when it was first thought up, and thus scientists said that it too had immense gravitational pull like a black hole (gravity would not reverse in this case), but instead of sucking in matter it would eject it at the event horizon. However Hawking proved that blackholes emit radiation at its event horizon as well and thus lose mass. Therefore upon death of a black hole, it would emit any remaining matter that it had engulfed in the form of radiation. Therefore he proved that the mathematical reversal of a black hole was indeed just a black hole.



Can you explain this statement "However Hawking proved that blackholes emit radiation at its event horizon as well and thus lose mass.". I don't see how a black hole can lose mass that has already passed the event horizon. No electromagnetic waves can escape once they are on the other side of the event horizon, and if they can't escape there can be no loss of internal matter......can you send me a link, or give me some information on where i can find Hawking's proof?
Member
Posts: 11,116
Joined: Aug 9 2006
Gold: 26,186.19
May 19 2009 04:35pm
Quote (RedFromWinter @ Mon, May 18 2009, 12:48am)
Can you explain this statement "However Hawking proved that blackholes emit radiation at its event horizon as well and thus lose mass.". I don't see how a black hole can lose mass that has already passed the event horizon. No electromagnetic waves can escape once they are on the other side of the event horizon, and if they can't escape there can be no loss of internal matter......can you send me a link, or give me some information on where i can find Hawking's proof?


Hawking's radiation is something pretty complicated...it involves antimatter and stuff...
Go Back To Science, Technology & Nature Topic List
12Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll