d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Science, Technology & Nature > Why Would A Big Mass Have Gravity
12Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 2,776
Joined: Aug 12 2008
Gold: 13.00
Warn: 100%
Jan 19 2009 02:19pm
o_o? why would it have a pull
Member
Posts: 16,429
Joined: Apr 3 2005
Gold: 282.00
Jan 19 2009 03:55pm
That is a fundamental force by which objects with mass interact. Objects dont really "have gravity", rather they exert a force on each other. That is Newtonian gravitation, in theory of relativity, gravitation is a geometric property, meaning that there is no force of gravity, instead objects with mass cause the curvature of space. You can't really answer why because this is the most fundamental question and we don't even know the nature of gravitation.
Member
Posts: 2,042
Joined: Jul 3 2006
Gold: 1.04
Jan 19 2009 04:48pm
Quote (kuter @ Mon, Jan 19 2009, 08:19pm)
o_o? why would it have a pull


actually all masses have gravity -- just the bigger they are the more appreciable the effect gets. So far, according to Einstein, gravity is explained by the fact that masses curve space -- so imagine a really plushy bed, and you put a basketball on it -- what happens when you roll a small marble tangent to the basketball? It'll start revolving around it (well, if it kept going it would travel like so). Thats pretty much a crude explanation of gravity.
Member
Posts: 9,692
Joined: Apr 10 2006
Gold: 19,597.59
Jan 19 2009 10:53pm
Quote (BovineDesi @ Mon, Jan 19 2009, 05:48pm)
actually all masses have gravity -- just the bigger they are the more appreciable the effect gets. So far, according to Einstein, gravity is explained by the fact that masses curve space -- so imagine a really plushy bed, and you put a basketball on it -- what happens when you roll a small marble tangent to the basketball? It'll start revolving around it (well, if it kept going it would travel like so). Thats pretty much a crude explanation of gravity.


i think thats more used to describe how timespace is warped by large groups of dense matter.
Member
Posts: 2,042
Joined: Jul 3 2006
Gold: 1.04
Jan 20 2009 03:09am
Quote (juliusjuice @ Tue, Jan 20 2009, 04:53am)
i think thats more used to describe how timespace is warped by large groups of dense matter.


uhm...thats exactly what gravity is (according to relativity)
Member
Posts: 1,452
Joined: Nov 7 2008
Gold: Locked
Trader: Scammer
Jan 20 2009 05:31am
i lold
Member
Posts: 2,776
Joined: Aug 12 2008
Gold: 13.00
Warn: 100%
Jan 20 2009 03:09pm
Quote (BovineDesi @ Mon, Jan 19 2009, 10:48pm)
actually all masses have gravity -- just the bigger they are the more appreciable the effect gets. So far, according to Einstein, gravity is explained by the fact that masses curve space -- so imagine a really plushy bed, and you put a basketball on it -- what happens when you roll a small marble tangent to the basketball? It'll start revolving around it (well, if it kept going it would travel like so). Thats pretty much a crude explanation of gravity.



that's not the question. also is gravity instantaneous or what whats the deal. why would a big object instantaneously pull stuff to it
Member
Posts: 2,042
Joined: Jul 3 2006
Gold: 1.04
Jan 20 2009 06:56pm
Quote (kuter @ Tue, Jan 20 2009, 09:09pm)
that's not the question. also is gravity instantaneous or what whats the deal. why would a big object instantaneously pull stuff to it


Uhm I just explained why it would have a pull (its technically not a pull) - - as far as your question is concerned, you asked why objects are attracted to each other, and I simply said it was the curvature of space that explained this 'attraction'.... Also what does instantaneously mean? Gravity works the moment that object comes into existence, and then pulls with a certain acceleration and eventually the object that it is pulling will get faster and faster... the further away the object is from the gravitational center, the less of an initial 'pull' it has...and technically it will never have an acceleration of 0, it will just be infinitely miniscule at extreme distances.
Banned
Posts: 102
Joined: Jan 19 2009
Gold: 0.00
Warn: 10%
Jan 20 2009 07:03pm
gravity isn't an "instantanous force"


if the sun were to disappear, you would have a ripple effect of spacetime@ the speed of light. so we wouldn't experience it being gone until after 8 minutes.

i think

This post was edited by 011011100101110111 on Jan 20 2009 07:05pm
Member
Posts: 3,472
Joined: Mar 22 2008
Gold: 2,537.00
Jan 20 2009 07:14pm
Quote (011011100101110111 @ Tue, Jan 20 2009, 06:03pm)
gravity isn't an "instantanous force"


if the sun were to disappear, you would have a ripple effect of spacetime@ the speed of light. so we wouldn't experience it being gone until after 8 minutes.

i think


that matter simply cant disappear (strictly against the rules), so this example is null.
Go Back To Science, Technology & Nature Topic List
12Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll