d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Science, Technology & Nature >
Poll > Cd Or Vinyl?
12Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
  Guests cannot view or vote in polls. Please register or login.
Member
Posts: 1,993
Joined: Mar 27 2007
Gold: 1,230.50
Dec 31 2008 11:38pm
I personally prefer Vinyl but use my iPod far more often.
When it comes to storage capacity, portability and convenience there is just no argument. CDs or mp3s are far better. that being said,
The difference between vinyl and CDs is that a CD is recorded digitally and a vinyl is an analog recording. Digital recordings are a series of snapshots of the actual sounds, therefore, do not capture the complete soundwaves. Analog, however, is what we hear in real life. A vinyl, though not completely perfect, has a copy of the actual sound carved onto it microscopically. But, any dust or minor imperfections are also picked up and amlified resulting in the static that is heard when listening to a imperfect vinyl.
It really boils down to what equipment you have and what level of audiophile you are.

A really good turntable (at least a Linn-Sondek or Thorens) coupled with high end speakers playing a virgin vinyl, half speed master version of a well recorded album will ALWAYS sound better than the CD on the same system. There's no question.

Here's a good illustration I found on the How Stuff Works website.

Member
Posts: 2,042
Joined: Jul 3 2006
Gold: 1.04
Jan 1 2009 08:33am
Quote (rfbfire @ Thu, Jan 1 2009, 05:38am)
I personally prefer Vinyl but use my iPod far more often.
When it comes to storage capacity, portability and convenience there is just no argument. CDs or mp3s are far better. that being said,
The difference between vinyl and CDs is that a CD is recorded digitally and a vinyl is an analog recording. Digital recordings are a series of snapshots of the actual sounds, therefore, do not capture the complete soundwaves. Analog, however, is what we hear in real life. A vinyl, though not completely perfect, has a copy of the actual sound carved onto it microscopically. But, any dust or minor imperfections are also picked up and amlified resulting in the static that is heard when listening to a imperfect vinyl.
It really boils down to what equipment you have and what level of audiophile you are.

A really good turntable (at least a Linn-Sondek or Thorens) coupled with high end speakers playing a virgin vinyl, half speed master version of a well recorded album will ALWAYS sound better than the CD on the same system. There's no question.

Here's a good illustration I found on the How Stuff Works website.
http://img242.imageshack.us/img242/1025/question487ar2.gif


hm i never actually knew that DVD's had better sound quality than CD's -- and though I do appreciate quality speakers (I even got myself $100 bose earbuds) I really couldn't care too much for a vinyl record. Not because they're old, but like you said, for it to sound good you need to take good care of it. Plus CD's are smaller, and more convenient -- I don't dj at all, so I'm not really affected by the difference in quality.
Member
Posts: 33,701
Joined: Jul 17 2006
Gold: 1,990.00
Jan 1 2009 04:45pm
never heard a vinyl but everyone says its better
Member
Posts: 16,429
Joined: Apr 3 2005
Gold: 282.00
Jan 1 2009 04:54pm
Quote (BovineDesi @ Thu, Jan 1 2009, 09:33am)
hm i never actually knew that DVD's had better sound quality than CD's -- and though I do appreciate quality speakers (I even got myself $100 bose earbuds) I really couldn't care too much for a vinyl record. Not because they're old, but like you said, for it to sound good you need to take good care of it. Plus CD's are smaller, and more convenient -- I don't dj at all, so I'm not really affected by the difference in quality.


yea but this is dvd audio, not regular dvd, regular dvd has the same sampling rate/discretization as CD for audio I think

I have a decent vinyl turntable and quite large collection of vinyls too. But it's too much of a hassle now, I don't listen to cd's either, mp3 320kbps is fine.
Member
Posts: 2,042
Joined: Jul 3 2006
Gold: 1.04
Jan 1 2009 09:37pm
Quote (Bes @ Thu, Jan 1 2009, 10:54pm)
yea but this is dvd audio, not regular dvd, regular dvd has the same sampling rate/discretization as CD for audio I think

I have a decent vinyl turntable and quite large collection of vinyls too. But it's too much of a hassle now, I don't listen to cd's either, mp3 320kbps is fine.


Do you know if CD's have worse sound quality than Vinyl simply because its a digital recording, or is it to reduce cost? As in could they be brought up to standard?
Member
Posts: 16,429
Joined: Apr 3 2005
Gold: 282.00
Jan 2 2009 10:28pm
Quote (BovineDesi @ Thu, Jan 1 2009, 10:37pm)
Do you know if CD's have worse sound quality than Vinyl simply because its a digital recording, or is it to reduce cost? As in could they be brought up to standard?


Well, CDs do have "lower quality" because the analog signal is being sampled/discretized, so in simple terms, the analog signal is being approximated. Some information is lost because in order not to have any losses you'd need infinite amount of samples(which pretty much defines continuous signal). But as far as distinguishing the quality goes...an average human probably wouldn't tell the difference between CD and vinyl.
Member
Posts: 6,591
Joined: Aug 3 2008
Gold: 663.00
Jan 2 2009 10:46pm
vinyls r the shit when it comes to turntables
Member
Posts: 5,257
Joined: Mar 20 2007
Gold: Locked
Trader: Scammer
Warn: 10%
Jan 12 2009 08:52am
CD
Member
Posts: 6,799
Joined: Jan 18 2007
Gold: 12,963.03
Jan 14 2009 02:12pm
cd
Member
Posts: 21,066
Joined: Dec 16 2005
Gold: 100.07
Jan 14 2009 02:32pm
Vinyl is great, but not entirely practical, and fuck me are they heavy when you've got stacks of 50.
Go Back To Science, Technology & Nature Topic List
12Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll