Quote (ChivasRegal @ Jul 16 2017 10:39pm)
Still haven't shown proof that football fields have an 18 inch hill in them, a cartoon picture recommendation from a fake grass website does not prove any actual football field has a hill in it.
And your explanation is just based on this faulty assumption, as well as the explanation itself is just malformed goobly gook too. But at least your consistent with your average of being wrong once per sentence, good job.
See, this is why you will never be taken seriously. I posted a source explaining the different kinds of drainage from a field managers association who actually maintains these fields, and you dismiss it as "not a source" or whatever, while posting YouTube videos and expecting us to take them seriously.
Oh, and dodging my question. If I can verify my model on a surface that I can verify to be flat, will you drop your "perspective" bullshit? I doubt you will agree to it, since that would mean your beliefs became dependent on evidence.