You're right

We're not supposed to tell you this

But you're the second season of "The Truman Show"

I have no idea what you are saying, the drop would be the same no matter what angle you view it at - if it was a sphere.

"Simultaneous Pics" - I think your talking about continuous video feed of a rocket launch from takeoff to 200 miles up - with multiple video cameras on it.

As for what does FE theory say about satellites - well look it up.



Thats right, that porn you were watching last night was actually me.



That's nice that your allowed internet access in the half way house you're committed in, I hope you get the psycho help you clearly need, How long have you had this delusion that your some kind of Doctor?
I wonder what other delusion you have - like LLD being a thing - if so, you need much help.

This post was edited by card_sultan on Jun 5 2016 09:29am

If your talking about the horizon view vs the drop then take the math for the drop and divide it it 2, because you're always in the center of the horizon view and the horizon is only 2d, either left or right.

This post was edited by card_sultan on Jun 5 2016 09:55am

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wyRJZbNmC7U

Part I in a series testing geocentrism and showing why it fails with math provided. Very good to listen to, but I haven't taken the time to double check his math.

Yup, that video is complete bollocks because he makes the same mistake all the quackademics do - trying to explain the FE model by putting the ball earth in the heliocentric model and assuming all the heliocentrics theories are true therefore all the FE theories are false, and insulting anyone who doesn't believe his personal biased thinking in that it must have to do with God or the Bible and anyone who question his bias is therefore uneducated, when in actuality FE'rs are for the large part Atheist and extremely well educated.

This

Who said the earth was perfectly flat? Nasa said the world is a perfectly circle globe in their hundreds of composites that claim to be real.

The curve is not accounted for in construction or ballistics. In fact the one time I know they did, the bridge had a hump in it - so more curve fail.

The image I posted is the math for a ball , which is what we are told by Nasa, and whether it's a perfect ball or oblate spheroid - the math is exactly or nearly the same so don't kid yourself by thinking humans shiity vision can explain why the math doesn't explain for why it doesn't agree with what you see.

For Example - Depth perception has nothing to do with perceiving the horizon of a ball - while the middle of that horizon is perfectly flat - the drop would still be visible on either side and since its not you're clearly mistaken and fooled. Photographically zoom in on any ball, and I guarantee you will always see curve, on the side.

There actually is not much of a conspiracy - maybe a few people who determine acceptable Airline routes and some that oversee Nasa, everyone else could be control easily and encouraged not to think about it by use of social stigma and anxiety over the fear of others not liking him because of

something they said, It just confirms how stupid and fake people are in that they are totally susceptible to this tactic and totally fear being different or thinking outside the box.

Oh, supposedly there's a FE theory about Moon eclipses - the fact you think it would be a straight line just shows how you are clearly still deluding yourself.

This post was edited by card_sultan on Jun 5 2016 05:29pm

Flat Hearth?

Seriously? This is 2016 dude..

The earth eclipses the moon from many different angles and there's ALWAYS a curve. What other shape could even theoretically do that? I'll wait for you to provide the math.

Easy answer: Look at the moon.
Q: What shape do you see "earths shadow" as?


Someone draw how the moon would look like if the world was flat?

This post was edited by Yiup on Jun 5 2016 06:34pm