Quote (ChivasRegal @ Jul 13 2017 03:54am)

Scientists say they found an impenetrable "shield" that surrounds the earth, not me.
Nasa says they can't get beyond Low Earth Orbit, not me.
If you can't get beyond low earth orbit and the earth is surrounded by an impenetrable shield, the burden of proof is on you my friend to figure it out.

See the problem is not really with Nasa, they're trying to tell you the what's up, but the problem is with people who can't get beyond their fantasies and refuse to see the lies.
It's like people think any Employee of Nasa has a PhD in absolute truth, they simply wash away all the info that disagrees with their bias and only see and hear what they want to.
Take for example those two clips Of Bill Nihilist - the Actor guy, one he is speaking from the heart, one he is selling you bs. If you can't tell the difference, you've much to learn about life and the nature of people.

Quote (kai_jph @ Jul 13 2017 06:02am)

where?

Quote (remco6 @ Jul 13 2017 02:28pm)

Quote (kai_jph @ Jul 13 2017 07:15am)

1st sentece

Two donuts of seething radiation that surround Earth, called the Van Allen radiation belts, have been found to contain a nearly impenetrable barrier that prevents the fastest, most energetic electrons from reaching Earth

further on They can wax and wane in response to incoming energy from the sun, sometimes swelling up enough to expose satellites in low-Earth orbit to damaging radiation


No talk of being impenetrable by space craft

Quote (ChivasRegal @ Jul 12 2017 07:54pm)

Scientists say they found an impenetrable "shield" that surrounds the earth, not me.
Nasa says they can't get beyond Low Earth Orbit, not me.
If you can't get beyond low earth orbit and the earth is surrounded by an impenetrable shield, the burden of proof is on you my friend to figure it out.

See the problem is not really with Nasa, they're trying to tell you the what's up, but the problem is with people who can't get beyond their fantasies and refuse to see the lies.
It's like people think any Employee of Nasa has a PhD in absolute truth, they simply wash away all the info that disagrees with their bias and only see and hear what they want to.
Take for example those two clips Of Bill Nihilist - the Actor guy, one he is speaking from the heart, one he is selling you bs. If you can't tell the difference, you've much to learn about life and the nature of people.

Quote (Thor123422 @ Jul 14 2017 04:05am)

Glad to see you totally dodged my response, because you can literally disprove your model of 3d perspective with a pair of binoculars, a baseball, and a basketball court.

Quote (ChivasRegal @ Jul 13 2017 02:28pm)

be my guest and produce this evidence that disproves it........or, all talk no action?

Quote (remco6 @ Jul 13 2017 06:10pm)

Nope, also assumes a globe earth.
Ofc Chivas has never actually read into the claims he made.
He should probably stick to using scripture for his scientific evidence it's more suitable to his level of intellectual honesty.

Quote (Thor123422 @ Jul 14 2017 06:09am)

See, you're the one proposing an unproven model of 3d perspective, so the burden of proof is on you.

But, if I take pictures and the ball is not significantly obscured by the ground, will you admit your model is wrong?