d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Science, Technology & Nature >
Poll > Flat Earth Vs Globe Earth
Prev18687888990119Next
Closed New Topic New Poll
  Guests cannot view or vote in polls. Please register or login.
Member
Posts: 63,908
Joined: Jun 26 2009
Gold: 169.70
Jul 12 2017 05:32am
Quote (kai_jph @ Jul 12 2017 08:03pm)
The Vid above is by a conspiracy theorist no one knows about.
NASA footage has never proven your theories so the question is. What proof do you have outside of youtube?

Since you showed pic from MIT how about a link from MIT or an equivalent site like I posted ?

That image you tried to use is on an image hosting site obviously edited as I proved with the link from the actual article

Still, no proof of the dome above the sun :lol:


In the copy of the Holy Bible (KJV) that I own, it says:
Genesis Chapter1. In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.


Do you happen to obtain a different version of the Bible that says the following:
In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth, and venus, and mars, and jupiter, and neptune, and the milky way, and asteroids, and comets, and the vacuum of a void space, and saturn, and space debri...

Let me know if you find a copy like that ok
Member
Posts: 29,304
Joined: Mar 27 2008
Gold: 504.69
Jul 12 2017 06:03am
Quote (ChivasRegal @ Jul 12 2017 06:17am)
genuine NASA footage is not reputable anymore?


According to flat earthers, no.
They don't understand burden of proof though.
Member
Posts: 63,908
Joined: Jun 26 2009
Gold: 169.70
Jul 12 2017 06:25am
Quote (ROM @ Jul 12 2017 09:33pm)
According to flat earthers, no.
They don't understand burden of proof though.


take a moment to think about that statement, and use some logic........
if NASA can't get high enough into the atmosphere to take a "real" picture of a "curved ball earth", because the Van Allen Radiation Belt (dome firmament) won't allow it, so instead they show fake CGI images of Ball earth......then how can FE researchers get high enough to take a pic of a flat disc earth?
if we produce CGI images of a flat disc earth taken from our fake FE Scrabble telescope, would that suffice?
Member
Posts: 23,832
Joined: Jun 18 2014
Gold: 6.69
Jul 12 2017 06:27am
Quote (ChivasRegal @ Jul 12 2017 01:32pm)
In the copy of the Holy Bible (KJV) that I own, it says:
Genesis Chapter1. In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.


Do you happen to obtain a different version of the Bible that says the following:
In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth, and venus, and mars, and jupiter, and neptune, and the milky way, and asteroids, and comets, and the vacuum of a void space, and saturn, and space debri...

Let me know if you find a copy like that ok


I rest my case. Still no link to scientific sites.
What about non-christain people who don't believe in The Bible?

Even if you take that as a scientific reference. Are those planets flat or globes?
Also is doesn't say any of them are below the dome as you claimed previously.

This post was edited by kai_jph on Jul 12 2017 06:47am
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
Jul 12 2017 07:19am
Quote (ChivasRegal @ Jul 12 2017 01:44am)
Your understanding is limited to the 2 d side view drawing , but we actually see in 3d optical perspective with our eyes - not with a 2d side view understanding in your head.

Open your eyes.


Give me an example of a system where there's a straight line between my eyes and a light source and I can't see the light source.

If you can't find any example except your made up perspective about the sun then your theory is dead in the water

If you were right I wouldn't be able to see a baseball across a straight blacktop

This post was edited by Thor123422 on Jul 12 2017 07:21am
Member
Posts: 29,304
Joined: Mar 27 2008
Gold: 504.69
Jul 12 2017 07:20am
Quote (ChivasRegal @ Jul 12 2017 08:25am)
take a moment to think about that statement, and use some logic........
if NASA can't get high enough into the atmosphere to take a "real" picture of a "curved ball earth", because the Van Allen Radiation Belt (dome firmament) won't allow it, so instead they show fake CGI images of Ball earth......then how can FE researchers get high enough to take a pic of a flat disc earth?
if we produce CGI images of a flat disc earth taken from our fake FE Scrabble telescope, would that suffice?


Take a second to Google burden of proof and apply some logic.

Did you provide any evidence to your claims?
If you say NASA can't get high enough into the atmosphere to take a "real" picture then the burden of proof is to provide evidence they cannot.
Member
Posts: 63,908
Joined: Jun 26 2009
Gold: 169.70
Jul 12 2017 07:54pm
Quote (ROM @ Jul 12 2017 10:50pm)
Take a second to Google burden of proof and apply some logic.

Did you provide any evidence to your claims?
If you say NASA can't get high enough into the atmosphere to take a "real" picture then the burden of proof is to provide evidence they cannot.


Scientists say they found an impenetrable "shield" that surrounds the earth, not me.
Nasa says they can't get beyond Low Earth Orbit, not me.
If you can't get beyond low earth orbit and the earth is surrounded by an impenetrable shield, the burden of proof is on you my friend to figure it out.

See the problem is not really with Nasa, they're trying to tell you the what's up, but the problem is with people who can't get beyond their fantasies and refuse to see the lies.
It's like people think any Employee of Nasa has a PhD in absolute truth, they simply wash away all the info that disagrees with their bias and only see and hear what they want to.
Take for example those two clips Of Bill Nihilist - the Actor guy, one he is speaking from the heart, one he is selling you bs. If you can't tell the difference, you've much to learn about life and the nature of people.
Member
Posts: 15,032
Joined: Apr 30 2008
Gold: 3.37
Jul 13 2017 12:15am
Psuedoscience
Member
Posts: 23,832
Joined: Jun 18 2014
Gold: 6.69
Jul 13 2017 12:17am
Quote (Ep0ch @ Jul 13 2017 08:15am)
Psuedoscience


this :locked:
Member
Posts: 29,304
Joined: Mar 27 2008
Gold: 504.69
Jul 13 2017 05:10am
Quote (ChivasRegal @ Jul 12 2017 09:54pm)
Scientists say they found an impenetrable "shield" that surrounds the earth, not me.
Nasa says they can't get beyond Low Earth Orbit, not me.
If you can't get beyond low earth orbit and the earth is surrounded by an impenetrable shield, the burden of proof is on you my friend to figure it out.

See the problem is not really with Nasa, they're trying to tell you the what's up, but the problem is with people who can't get beyond their fantasies and refuse to see the lies.
It's like people think any Employee of Nasa has a PhD in absolute truth, they simply wash away all the info that disagrees with their bias and only see and hear what they want to.
Take for example those two clips Of Bill Nihilist - the Actor guy, one he is speaking from the heart, one he is selling you bs. If you can't tell the difference, you've much to learn about life and the nature of people.


You don't understand burden of proof yet. Get a better understanding of this simple concept before you try to tell anyone what shape the earth is.
Go Back To Science, Technology & Nature Topic List
Prev18687888990119Next
Closed New Topic New Poll