Gravity is the force of attraction between all masses in space across time.

Also, are you saying that you believe all water in the universe exists only on Earth?

-edit

Space and time are malleable, they have a physical substance to them, they are both effected and manipulated by gravity. (and velocity, but that's another conversation)

Space-time is a container and the mechanism that allows the universe expand and evolve.

Gravity would be the Anti-Space Time. (Getting on the theoretical here)

This post was edited by Ep0ch on Mar 3 2017 11:53pm

Odd there is no liquid bodies of water on any of the other "planets", just a few hypotheses that some might exist, but i doubt those are planets at all and if they are - life might exist on the the flat plane inside of their plasmaspheres.

Burden of proof?

-edit

I will help.

Proof of water on mars.
https://www.nasa.gov/press-release/nasa-confirms-evidence-that-liquid-water-flows-on-today-s-mars/

Proof of water on Neptune.
http://www.universetoday.com/736/are-there-oceans-on-neptune/

Proof of water on Europa
http://hubblesite.org/pubinfo/pdf/2016/33/pdf.pdf


-edit #2

Pst, heres some more proof.

The reason some meteorites explode violently in the atmosphere is because the ice inside them evaporates instantly and expands so fast it causes a massive explosion.
This would not be possible if water didn't exist outside of the earth.


OFC you will deny of of this outright.


I bet you also think that humanity is the only intelligent life form in the universe, past, present, and future.

Do you really think that in the vastness of the universe, considering that hydrogen and oxygen are among the most abundant elements, that all the water in it exists only on earth?
If so, how is that logical?

Do you really think that in the vastness of the universe, the materials and conditions for intelligent life only occurred here on earth?

The universe is almost 14 billion years.

Humanity has been around for 200k years, but we didn't start to matter much in terms of understanding macro/micro physics, electro and thermodynamics, the nature of space-time and the fundamental forces of nature and elements of life, till the last 5ish decades.



This post was edited by Ep0ch on Mar 4 2017 12:06am

So like i said, a few hypotheses , no actual proof.

That you think an inclining of hypothesis is proof, denotes your simple fantastical whimsical sci-fi cartoon mind.

Why do you hide like a coward?
Stand strong, make your presence known!



You realize, you are doctor banjo right?

This post was edited by Ep0ch on Mar 4 2017 12:15am

cartoon reality proved ,grow up kid.

More fallacies. How enlightend.

-edit

I wonder if you realize most of the writers for futurama have phds in advanced mathmatics or advanced physics.

This post was edited by Ep0ch on Mar 4 2017 12:44am

stop posting cartoons that you think are reality that are just completely sarcastic and you can't tell the difference.

Futurama is like Rick and Marty, you really need to be older to understand the sarcasm,

"R" rating in this case has nothing to do with naked women, it has to do with actually understanding the irony.

young minds cannot fathom this concept at all, they think they now it all, they rush to judgement - they know nothing.

This post was edited by card_sultan on Mar 4 2017 12:49am

They are more informative than you are.

Ps futurama is a show about irony.


R and m is a parody of back to the future. And play on social and geopolitical issues, like pc, religion, ethics and morality. Also it is a meta in that the main char is rick, "aware" that he is a cartoon. Hence all the fourth wall breaking.

This post was edited by Ep0ch on Mar 4 2017 12:54am

well thanks for admitting where you get your "information" from.

Its truly ironic because space it not the simple things you were taught, it is a mere flash that allows you to choose whether to learn more or end your learning.

Your learning or understanding is not over - it is just beginning.

This post was edited by card_sultan on Mar 4 2017 01:01am