Quote (Ep0ch @ Jul 4 2017 12:48pm)

Is Heliocentrism just the pseudopsyence State religion from astro-priests? Lets investigate:
1. Starts with a conclusion, then works backwards to confirm.- Confirmed the Earth was a ball 2500 years ago, worked backwards to prove it to curverts
2. Hostile to criticism - Suggest Heliocentrism is not real and watch people go complete bat shit crazy, its definitely a religious cult belief.
3. Uses vague jargon to confuse and evade.- If you cant explain it just throw either Gravity, refraction or relativity into your sentence.
4. Grandiose claims that go beyond the evidence.- Earth spinning or the curve has not been detected, cant physically prove it with empirical evidence
5. Cherry picks only favorable evidence.- Eratosthenes also claimed the sun being close could explain shadows, but lets just cherry pick the idea that it can only be because the sun is far away.
- The cycle of the moon has been known for 5000 years, but lets destroy all civilizations and knowledge that don't agree the Earth is a spinning ball.
6. Uses flawed methods with unrepeatable results. - No one can repeat the Gyro experiment that claimed it showed the earth spinning
- The Cavendish experiment has not been shown
- Vertical landing was never able to be produced on Earth during the Apollo years
- No one can repeat using a Hasselblad camera (like they used on the moon)without need to focus the image and still have the images in perfect exposure and focus
7. Lone mavericks working in isolationNewton, Cavendish, |+ most Astronauts were loners, look at Neil Armstrong – peer reviewed is just using kangaroo court affirmations based on popular opinion.
8. uses inconsistent and invalid logic- Most of Heliocentrism uses circle jerk logic – where they say its true in one instance but it doesn't apply to another instance
9. Dogmatic and unyielding- Heliocentrism is the Dogma of the state – programmed into your belief ever since you could even start to think.
- is it unyielding – most definitely