d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Science, Technology & Nature > The Moon > A Ridiculous Liberal Myth
Prev1789
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 20,461
Joined: Jun 16 2008
Gold: 722.53
Warn: 10%
Mar 9 2011 11:27pm
Quote (dothe @ Mar 10 2011 04:55am)
the theory is that supermassive black hole > expansion


If our measuring tools are not as expanded as the light then only then can we measure whether or not the light is expanded. Otherwise if all space was expanding then that would mean we wouldn't notice because the measurer and the wavelength would be proportionate during expansion. So the only way we would know space is expanding by light expanding is if space around us wasn't expanding as well. Which doesn't make sense with the theory that space itself is expanding everywhere equally.


So what about everything? If galaxies can move apart then why doesn't everything move apart? Space itself is expanding, so why don't the earth and the moon separate? Gravity is a weak enough force and the masses of the earth and moon are relatively small. Or why don't atoms break apart?
Member
Posts: 11,277
Joined: Jan 24 2007
Gold: 11.00
Mar 9 2011 11:37pm
there would still be redshift even if 2 galaxies were moving away from one another in a non-expanding universe.

as for the last part, it's like i said, supermassive black holes are hypothesized to be the reason galactic matter stays together, while moving away from one another. it's not about the gravity between the earth and the moon, its about all the matter in a galaxy being attracted to the supermassive black hole at the center. although it is largely bound by the mass of dark matter. atoms dont break apart because the snf is millions of times stronger than gravity.

This post was edited by dothe on Mar 9 2011 11:37pm
Member
Posts: 20,461
Joined: Jun 16 2008
Gold: 722.53
Warn: 10%
Mar 9 2011 11:48pm
Quote (dothe @ Mar 10 2011 05:37am)
there would still be redshift even if 2 galaxies were moving away from one another in a non-expanding universe.

as for the last part, it's like i said, supermassive black holes are hypothesized to be the reason galactic matter stays together, while moving away from one another. it's not about the gravity between the earth and the moon, its about all the matter in a galaxy being attracted to the supermassive black hole at the center. although it is largely bound by the mass of dark matter. atoms dont break apart because the snf is millions of times stronger than gravity.


Yes, but that wouldnt' be because of space epxanding but because of the doppler shift, which causes a change in wavelength in light that is measurably different from the measuring apparatus' scale.

Space itself is expanding. Gravity is weak enough to cause gravitationally attracted objects to spread apart. So why don't the moon and the earth separate?
Member
Posts: 11,277
Joined: Jan 24 2007
Gold: 11.00
Mar 10 2011 12:00am
Quote (AEtheric @ Mar 10 2011 12:48am)
Yes, but that wouldnt' be because of space epxanding but because of the doppler shift, which causes a change in wavelength in light that is measurably different from the measuring apparatus' scale.

Space itself is expanding. Gravity is weak enough to cause gravitationally attracted objects to spread apart. So why don't the moon and the earth separate?


yes thats redshift..you said "only then can we measure whether or not the light is expanded". the expanding space theory is based on the fact that basically all galaxies are moving away from us. that wouldnt make sense in a static, closed universe. the redshift is just proof that they are moving away.

"Gravity is weak enough to cause gravitationally attracted objects to spread apart." lol interesting sentence

"So why don't the moon and the earth separate?"

gravity on a large scale (galaxy) is actually extremely strong.

This post was edited by dothe on Mar 10 2011 12:00am
Member
Posts: 20,461
Joined: Jun 16 2008
Gold: 722.53
Warn: 10%
Mar 10 2011 12:46am
Quote (dothe @ Mar 10 2011 06:00am)
yes thats redshift..you said "only then can we measure whether or not the light is expanded". the expanding space theory is based on the fact that basically all galaxies are moving away from us. that wouldnt make sense in a static, closed universe. the redshift is just proof that they are moving away.

"Gravity is weak enough to cause gravitationally attracted objects to spread apart."  lol interesting sentence

"So why don't the moon and the earth separate?"

gravity on a large scale (galaxy) is actually extremely strong.


Yes, but they claim that they can also measure the expansion of the universe through the expansion of space itself. Even if they only measure redshift through doppler shift and understand from that the expansion of the universe then we couldn't say space itself is expanding with certainty.

That sentence was complete fail. I meant to say "Gravity is weak enough to allow gravitationally attracted objects to spread apart [due to space expanding].

Well yeah, but since gravity is an incredibly weak force it takes a lot of mass to pull things together strongly.

Somehow space expanding is moving galaxies and stars but it isn't moving any other matter or causing any bonds to break besides gravitational. It must be a weak expansion, but I've heard it's faster than light.
Member
Posts: 11,277
Joined: Jan 24 2007
Gold: 11.00
Mar 10 2011 12:54am
Quote (AEtheric @ Mar 10 2011 01:46am)
Yes, but they claim that they can also measure the expansion of the universe through the expansion of space itself. Even if they only measure redshift through doppler shift and understand from that the expansion of the universe then we couldn't say space itself is expanding with certainty. you're right we cant say it with certainty.  it is sometimes presented with certainty only because the overwhelming majority of cosmologists have believed in it for so long

That sentence was complete fail. I meant to say "Gravity is weak enough to allow gravitationally attracted objects to spread apart [due to space expanding].

Well yeah, but since gravity is an incredibly weak force it takes a lot of mass to pull things together strongly.

Somehow space expanding is moving galaxies and stars but it isn't moving any other matter or causing any bonds to break besides gravitational. It must be a weak expansion, but I've heard it's faster than light. and yet light itself cannot even overpower the smallest of black holes


~~~
Member
Posts: 823
Joined: Aug 23 2010
Gold: 198.00
Mar 11 2011 12:15am
not sure if this was pointed out...but the moon does rotate ever so slowly
Member
Posts: 171
Joined: Feb 1 2011
Gold: 15.00
Apr 9 2011 12:56pm
Quote (AEtheric @ Mar 10 2011 12:27am)
If our measuring tools are not as expanded as the light then only then can we measure whether or not the light is expanded. Otherwise if all space was expanding then that would mean we wouldn't notice because the measurer and the wavelength would be proportionate during expansion. So the only way we would know space is expanding by light expanding is if space around us wasn't expanding as well. Which doesn't make sense with the theory that space itself is expanding everywhere equally.


So what about everything? If galaxies can move apart then why doesn't everything move apart? Space itself is expanding, so why don't the earth and the moon separate? Gravity is a weak enough force and the masses of the earth and moon are relatively small. Or why don't atoms break apart?


LOL the moon is ever so slowely drifting apart from the earths gravitation pull.
Any point you just made has been shut down
Go Back To Science, Technology & Nature Topic List
Prev1789
Add Reply New Topic New Poll