I only quoted the part of the essay that was about "the glass ceiling" - you just saw an artists picture of ball earth and think it confirms ball earth so the article confirms ball earth, your a very dishonest person.

We were talking about whether the bible was correct in changing the word firmament to just meaning all of the sky and i posted proof of an actual firmament and quote the article as saying

“It’s almost like these electrons are running into a glass wall in space. "
said Prof Baker, who is the first author of the paper published in the journal Nature.

and you changer the subject entirely not even using the essay in the context i was and saying it has a picture of ball earth it should only be used to prove ball earth

A fuking glasswall in space is not all of the sky.

You are a completely ridiculous and dishonest troller and a piece of trash.

This post was edited by card_sultan on Jan 25 2017 02:23pm

A perspective that doesn't include a closeup of the shoreline to confirm that the water is flat there also?

You realize there isn't an actual glass ceiling, right? And that this "glass ceiling" only keeps out charged particles, right? And that there is no "firmament" as you're trying to pretend (being the liar you are)? And that your source said its data were collected by satellites? And that your "glass ceiling" is the result of the Earth's dipole magnetic field? As an aside, did you know that there's no proven monopole magnet that has ever existed, only been theorized? You want to pretend your source confirms a tangent of a point you want to be true, which it very much doesn't, and somehow I'm the liar here? GTFO liar. You lost. You have no credibility anymore. Checkmate, motherfucker.

“It’s almost like these electrons are running into a glass wall in space. "
said Prof Baker, who is the first author of the paper published in the journal Nature.


Maybe you can walk through impenetrable walls made of plasma and electrons that travel at the speed of light itself, maybe your shit doesn't stink either?

i like how "water is always flat" turned into "water is sometimes flat" lol

oh please oh please OH PLEASE post that pic of what you think perspective looks like again that's tilted at a 45 showing you think humans stand like the michael jackson lean dance and have to "look up" at the horizon. please post it. i want to learn how to do that dance.



holy fucking dodge, doesnt even touch satellites or the dipole. its almost as if he doesnt have an answer and isnt even pretending to anymore. pathetic.

i guess your not trying is a sign you've realized you lost. makes sense

This post was edited by thesnipa on Jan 25 2017 02:56pm

Walls impenetrable to charged particles =/= walls impenetrable to solid mass.

idk bro my particles are feeling charged and my mass is slowly growing solid.

Oh that retarded picture that i was explaining why it's retarded that you think is retarded because i drew it?

Its actually a screenshot from this Heliotard video



I bet you immediately start worshiping this picture now.

Thats its retarded because he's trying to show how his 2 dimension idea of the Horizon and how it can be shown with math because it fools you into accepting the actual 3 dimensional perspective of the horizon

This post was edited by card_sultan on Jan 25 2017 04:10pm

So are you willing to admit that water isn't always flat? The point I was making is that water doesn't have some magic property of "flatness" that somehow invalidates a spherical earth. Water will assume a shape based on the forces acting on each individual molecule, and that shape can be anything.



You don't know what plasma or electrons are (not surprisingly), so it's understandable why you'd think this. Plasma is ionized gas, so it's actually trivial for a person to pass through plasma. A sufficiently hot flame is plasma, so by jumping over a hot campfire you just "walked through impenetrable walls made of plasma".
Also, electrons do not (and cannot) travel at the speed of light. The speed of an electron orbiting a nucleus of an atom is around 1/100 of the speed of light. Electrons are also trivial to stop with a magnetic field, which a person would walk through without even noticing.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charged_particle

In physics, a charged particle is a particle with an electric charge. It may be an ion, such as a molecule or atom with a surplus or deficit of electrons relative to protons.

So whats your proof that you're not made of particles or atoms? Even specials snowflakes like you are made of particles but certainly you could make the case your grey matter is stuck in neutral.

This post was edited by card_sultan on Jan 25 2017 04:19pm