ok you made your point...I still not sure they know one way or the other..once sure, twice not so sure...trust them to reveal the results to us...

A faulty timing circuit was discovered that was essentially subtracting 73 nanoseconds from the flight time, enough to alter their calculated speed from slower than light, to faster than light. Without this faulty circuit, no result has ever shown faster than light neutrinos... So yeah; you can get flight times faster than light, but only when you use dodgy equipment!

This post was edited by Azrad on Jul 23 2013 09:28am

ok and from that star sickness? name close enough to where you should know of it? or look it up

What is "star sickness"?

This post was edited by Azrad on Jul 23 2013 09:32am

they detected neutrinos that move faster then the speed of light, to move such a distance from a star as they should degenerate faster.

faulty equipment and miss calculations? 73 nana secs after the first test they missed that?

This post was edited by doomchaser on Jul 23 2013 09:37am

i don't know anything about "sick stars", do you have a link?

no links on it i heard some professor speak of it some where lately gave some name of the star sicknessb1115 or something like that.. sickness is right not sure the spelling on the star or the numbers behind it

Well I "heard" the moon is made out of cheese, but I can't back that up...

edit: wait do you mean Cygnus X-3?

This post was edited by Azrad on Jul 23 2013 09:43am

Well seemed those two things go in this thread 73 nana secs equipment error and a star that may shoot them out..2 things that establish the possiblity that they do..Did you debunk them both or just say i am mistaking?

first 1 debunked according to what you know of the test and what they revealed of it.

2nd one you know nothing about, soo i must be mistaked in my information?
cygnus ha could be but for sure it had a 15 in the name or a 5

This post was edited by doomchaser on Jul 23 2013 09:48am