d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Science, Technology & Nature > Microwave Warfare Explained > By Dr. Barrie Trower
Prev167891012Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 5,628
Joined: May 29 2006
Gold: 5.00
Mar 1 2013 09:40pm
Quote (doomchaser @ Mar 1 2013 04:25pm)
1. Microwaves don't cause cancer. that can be argued with, by lots of studies i been looking up..clusters of brain tumors by cell phone towers and more

Choosing what cancer your target gets is laughable. different frequencies affects certain area's of the body seems logical to me


3. Reduction of Immune system has been proven cause of exposure to microwaves(not really and issues but one of the few kernels of truth the threw in).

. I've found no evidence of the the psychological impacts of Microwave exposure he listed. While there are some, most come from the thermal exposure caused by the microwaves vs the microwaves themselves. not sure you have a opinion on this as I don't have 1 will leave it at that need technical support when people work under lights 24/7 it affects their mental state so some studies suggest


over all your short list of issues seems weak if you ask me like they used to say about cigs. where do you get your information about cancer and microwaves? have you even looked up clusters of cancer and what some suspect the cause is? Who says it don't cause cancer as a fact? i would like this info and how they reached their conclusions

Studies thus far have not shown a consistent link between cell phone use and cancers of the brain, nerves, or other tissues of the head or neck. More research is needed because cell phone technology and how people use cell phones have been changing rapidly.
or have they suppressed those studies like Barrie Trower suggest they have? and like we seen done in the not soo far past by people who make profits of of things they sell us.

Barrie Trower  is not making a profit releasing this info soo what could be his agenda for misleading us?


I got my information from various scientific studies i found on google, you know the kind with citation, sources and actual science? As soon as you present reliable information, IE not Barrie Trower, then ill be willing to change my position. Since that how science works, New information is presented and opinions change. Where you on the other hand have actual facts/evidence presented to you and you ignore it in favor of your conspiracy theories. There is something you should know, the world is a scary unexplained place, not everything is a conspiracy. If you can't live without thinking that someone somewhere is controlling everything then keep it to yourself and don't present it as actual science, because it is not.
Member
Posts: 17,045
Joined: Jan 29 2007
Gold: 6,059.43
Mar 2 2013 01:20am
Quote (Aisu_aS @ Mar 1 2013 08:40pm)
I got my information from various scientific studies i found on google, you know the kind with citation, sources and actual science? As soon as you present reliable information, IE not Barrie Trower, then ill be willing to change my position. Since that how science works, New information is presented and opinions change. Where you on the other hand have actual facts/evidence presented to you and you ignore it in favor of your conspiracy theories. There is something you should know, the world is a scary unexplained place, not everything is a conspiracy. If you can't live without thinking that someone somewhere is controlling everything then keep it to yourself and don't present it as actual science, because it is not.


realible sources? most the science community paid for keeping their mouth shut once they get into a field such as this. or lie to us....resources that pay for the studies have rights too the findings I guess.... who can afford such things the science community at large or the ones with big monney behind it.

my last post was from them so called reliable source.. not Barrie Trower....They admit only 1 thing more study needs to be done

Quote
Studies thus far have not shown a consistent link between cell phone use and cancers of the brain, nerves, or other tissues of the head or neck. More research is needed because cell phone technology and how people use cell phones have been changing rapidly

they have their excuse for killing us right there

This post was edited by doomchaser on Mar 2 2013 01:26am
Member
Posts: 5,628
Joined: May 29 2006
Gold: 5.00
Mar 2 2013 02:24am
Quote (doomchaser @ Mar 2 2013 02:20am)
realible sources? most the science community paid for keeping their mouth shut once they get into a field such as this. or lie to us....resources that pay for the studies have rights too the findings I guess.... who can afford such things the science community at large or the ones with big monney behind it.

my last post was from them so called reliable source.. not Barrie Trower....They admit only 1 thing more study needs to be done


they have their excuse for killing us right there


One line, not cited, in a incoherent rant is not a source.

So far all you have posted is attacks against the scientific community without posting any facts.

Here, I believe, This pertains to you:
Quote (Alan Moore)

The main thing that I learned about conspiracy theory is that conspiracy theorists actually believe in a conspiracy because that is more comforting. The truth of the world is that it is chaotic. The truth is, that it is not the Jewish banking conspiracy or the grey aliens or the 12 foot reptiloids from another dimension that are in control. The truth is more frightening, nobody is in control. The world is rudderless.
Member
Posts: 17,045
Joined: Jan 29 2007
Gold: 6,059.43
Mar 3 2013 03:49am
ok ok use the C word and ofc... the people who would pay for these studies tell us the truth???..We see the truth from those scientists at Japan's nuclear plants. And at our cigarette and oil companies all the time.
What proof do I need to discredit these sources of your's?

This post was edited by doomchaser on Mar 3 2013 03:52am
Member
Posts: 40,915
Joined: Jul 8 2009
Gold: 0.00
Mar 3 2013 01:56pm
Quote (doomchaser @ Mar 3 2013 03:49am)
ok ok use the C word and ofc... the people who would pay for these studies tell us the truth???..We see the truth from those scientists at Japan's nuclear plants. And at our cigarette and oil companies all the time.
What proof do I need to discredit these sources of your's?


You could always start by posting credible proof showing the fallacy of these groups.

You know... As opposed to rattling off whatever nonsense you find on the downside of youtube's butt crack.
Member
Posts: 17,045
Joined: Jan 29 2007
Gold: 6,059.43
Mar 3 2013 04:43pm
Quote (piddywiffle @ Mar 3 2013 12:56pm)
You could always start by posting credible proof showing the fallacy of these groups.

You know... As opposed to rattling off whatever nonsense you find on the downside of youtube's butt crack.


We see the proof of how they lie to us every day...unless your head is soo far up your own ass
Member
Posts: 40,915
Joined: Jul 8 2009
Gold: 0.00
Mar 3 2013 05:36pm
Quote (doomchaser @ Mar 3 2013 04:43pm)
We see the proof of how they lie to us every day...unless your head is soo far up your own ass


This is not a source nor is it anything that resembles proof.
Member
Posts: 10,812
Joined: Oct 15 2009
Gold: Locked
Warn: 20%
Mar 4 2013 04:30am
Excellent work:
Subwoofer
russian
Derkaderk
Aisu_aS
piddywiffle

Now the only question left is; which of the following payment sources do you want to be shown on your W-2? You guy qualify for any of the following:
Code
1. "I for one, welcome our reptile overlords" account.
2. "Protocols of the elders of zion" defence fund.
3. The newly created "Prevent Barrie Trower from upsetting 200 years of physics without publishing a single paper" NGO account.
4. The eclectic "Let's give everyone (including our selves) cancer with microwaves" initiative.
5. or just the standard NWO slush-fund?


This post was edited by Azrad on Mar 4 2013 04:30am
Member
Posts: 40,915
Joined: Jul 8 2009
Gold: 0.00
Mar 4 2013 11:10am
Quote (Azrad @ Mar 4 2013 04:30am)
Excellent work:
Subwoofer
russian
Derkaderk
Aisu_aS
piddywiffle

Now the only question left is; which of the following payment sources do you want to be shown on your W-2? You guy qualify for any of the following:
Code
1. "I for one, welcome our reptile overlords" account.
2. "Protocols of the elders of zion" defence fund.
3. The newly created "Prevent Barrie Trower from upsetting 200 years of physics without publishing a single paper" NGO account.
4. The eclectic "Let's give everyone (including our selves) cancer with microwaves" initiative.
5. or just the standard NWO slush-fund?


I guess the sequester cut the "Sexy Ned Flanders 'feels like I'm wearing nothing at all'" pension?

Ah well... I suppose I'll take 1. "I for one, welcome our reptile overlords" account.
Member
Posts: 32,985
Joined: Mar 17 2005
Gold: 6.00
Mar 4 2013 11:23am
Quote (Azrad @ Mar 4 2013 04:30am)
Excellent work:
Subwoofer
russian
Derkaderk
Aisu_aS
piddywiffle

Now the only question left is; which of the following payment sources do you want to be shown on your W-2? You guy qualify for any of the following:
Code
1. "I for one, welcome our reptile overlords" account.
2. "Protocols of the elders of zion" defence fund.
3. The newly created "Prevent Barrie Trower from upsetting 200 years of physics without publishing a single paper" NGO account.
4. The eclectic "Let's give everyone (including our selves) cancer with microwaves" initiative.
5. or just the standard NWO slush-fund?


i think on top of the 9/11 victim fund i'll take some of number 2.
Go Back To Science, Technology & Nature Topic List
Prev167891012Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll