I agree with what i quoted "that its like there is a glass ceiling." That i totally believe everything that was in that essay is your silly and dishonest assumption and the more you deflect your guilt, in not actually acknowledging this mistake that only a child would assume, i just shows how stupid your trolls are.

Thanks again for proving once again you are the worst troll on jsp.



In your own words you're a troll, checkmate motherfuker.

Is this your intent - you cant prove ball earth so anyone who points out its faults are just going to get trolled to death by complete morons




This post was edited by card_sultan on Jan 24 2017 12:25pm

"i post sources i dont agree with"

so basically all sources by you are garbage. but you think this means you're equipped to debate?

wow this rabbit hole is getting DEEP. so every youtube video or source you've ever posted is not actually factually source-able. jesus you really are backing into the corner now.

wrong again - you seem to think its either/or. There are parts i agree with - parts i dont. Maybe this is your problem - you really dont know how to process information - everything is either black or white for you.

This was not posted as a proof for flat Earth - I posted this to prove there is what scientists refer to as a dome. And the fact that they even acknoledge a dome in the first place is a giant leap foward, probably this is why you troll so hard - because you dont want other people to realize this?

If you want to question a source and ask if i believe it entirely, its fine, most of the Flat Earth videos that i have posted, i dont have a problem with.

That essay i think is trying to suggest geocentric proof while remaining in the allowed and approved scholastic rhetoric, it takes skill to do that, something you dont posses. Basically it points out that everything must sound Heliocentric or people like you will totally freak out like the crybully special snowflake you are.

This post was edited by card_sultan on Jan 24 2017 12:46pm

maybe your problem is that the parts you agree with are dependent on the parts you don't. maybe that's why you lost. maybe that's why you are continuing to dodge the demands to break down what you do and don't believe in. because you realize once you start down that path your whole argument falls apart and you all of a sudden need to majorly expand on your model to even make sense.

i bet right about now you're REALLY regretting posting that source.

I dont regret posting that link at all - to me is is proof that science refers to and acknowledges that Earth has a dome/firmament. You misunderstood my intent in thinking that i thought all of science totally agrees the Earth is flat, and that is simply not true and dishonest of yourself to assume that i was saying that. However there are plenty of scientist that do and are being bullied by psychotic crytrolls like yourself who feel justified in their temper tantrum and need to use cryptic words like in this essay, you just have zero ability to recognize them.

This post was edited by card_sultan on Jan 24 2017 12:59pm

Lol this is a deep hole. Lets see if card can dig his way out to China. Shit that won't work on a flat earth

Exactly - the air being a ball or the plasmashere surrounding ball earth is just assumed to be a ball because people think the Earth is a ball and I think Aristotle, Eratosthenes, Copernicus, King Henry, Newton, Cavendish and even Einstein himself were all just tools of propaganda for the elite in order to fool people in their quest for profit. 72% of the Earth surface is water and water is always flat, Earth cannot be a spinning ball. We are not space dust. Organized religion and organized Astro Science use the exact same dogma to control how people think, neither are fully wrong - how can a hammer be wrong - it cant - maybe just the way people use it is incorrect.

Backpedaling off your own source with word salad. Sad

Typical fake troll, so desperate.

inb4 daddy troll tries to rescue you....

This post was edited by card_sultan on Jan 24 2017 02:50pm

What we've learned in the last page or so of posts:

1. Tard_sultan uses sources he doesn't understand.
2. Tard_sultan misquotes those same sources, distorting what they actually say into something he wants them to say.
3. Tard_sultan thinks that he can cherry pick a few select passages from scholarly sources whilst ignoring all the contradictory information from the exact same sources, treating the rest as invalid.
4. Tard_sultan sees no hypocrisy.
5. Tard_sultan thinks his arguments are valid because they might have the tiniest modicum of plausibility, but he gets to ignore contradictory information.
6. Tard_sultan is reinforcing how utterly dishonest he is, and sits there with a straight face claiming the people who disbelieve his bullshit are themselves the liars.

If you yourself can't rely on the validity of your own sources, we don't have to view any of your other sources as valid. Nothing you claim going forward, and even in retrospect, is legitimate. If you don't stand behind the validity of your own sources, neither will anyone else.