you speak the truth for once, checkmate Bigfoot Brain.

This post was edited by card_sultan on Jan 24 2017 07:16am

i mean we're all just posting now to make fun of you because the games over but sure. focus on what you need to to dodge and think the games still going. you lost card, maybe move on to 911 or ancient civilizations. those are still conversations i can have with you but on flat earth im done and most everyone should be. you posted a source which contradicts arguments you've been making for a year, you need to debunk that source partially or totally before this can even continue.

i know you act like you dont care, but the truth is you have just as much fun as anyone in these threads prob more. if you cant at least play along with your own sources though its not even worth anyones time

K, ill be as dishonest as you -

you never proved you agree with every single written word of Newton, Einstein and Copernicus , checkmate motherfuker - Ball Earth is a joke!

Does this mean you stop trolling and expressing your rage now that your game has been revealed?

Flat Earth is not over - you never proofed any of it wrong, just that you become enraged when i question it.

This post was edited by card_sultan on Jan 24 2017 08:13am

you're right i didn't prove any of flat earth wrong, you did. by posting a source which disproves it as proof of it.

if you're asking me to blindly accept everything former scientists have said that's not equivalent though, i didn't post anything by them, unlike you.

a few posts back i said i predicted the death throws now that the game is up, you'll lash out and try to deflect to anything you can to keep the discourse going. you're scared your toy is being taken away.

but until you address your own sources there is no discussion, there is only shame post after shame post until this and every thread from now until forever is closed for spam. you have a choice here, give up on flat earth and admit you talked yourself into a corner, or actually dive into your own source and break down what is and isnt true in it and why those work on a flat earth. otherwise, its over card.

and you never will



that's your assumption, its just as dishonest as thinking a photo from Nasa proves Ball Earth when its shown to be just a composite and its revealed how they make it.

I assume you mean your trolling is over, Geocentricity is far from over and but its funny you think you have that authority based on your false assumptions and dishonest circle jerk logic. Classic.




This post was edited by card_sultan on Jan 24 2017 08:39am

The Earth Is Flat - "Paint it Black" Cover

I know you've deceived me, now here's a surprise
I know that you have 'cause there's magic in my eyes

I can see for miles and miles and miles and miles and miles
Oh yeah

its not my assumption at all, its the logical conclusion of the events. you claimed repeatedly that things listed in that source as fact were not fact. then you sourced it. arguing against yourself. i am not even involved. no one is involved but you. you are arguing with yourself, my posts are simply commentary on this. Santas posts are just facilitating the conversation you're having with yourself. the fact that you disagree with this means you disagree with yourself, not either of us. you are now running from yourself while i comment on it, you aren't even running from me. you have yet to address your own mistake because you're scared, deflecting, thrashing out as you slowly come to grips with your own mistake. again, these aren't my judgement i am just an observer. and all you will get are mocking observations on the conversation you have with yourself until you rectify the situation. i know you are too prideful to admit that you enjoy these debates, and you'll lie to save face and claim you were just "posting facts" when a bunch of people came along and forced you into a debate you have no stake in. but after you realize that you're shouts into an echo chamber simply aren't fun in the long run don't worry, we'll still be hear pointing out your glaring mistake while you run from yourself so u can address it at any time that is convenient for you. Once you've cooled off and realized you need to explain far more to continue down the same path feel free to rejoin the conversation.

It is your assumption, I never claimed all things in the article were facts that i agreed with - in fact i only quoted the part about it talking about a glass ceiling and if you had the intellectual honesty to follow the fucking discussion - we were arguing about whether the word firmament meant sky or dome, is there ever an end to your silly trolling, stupid assumptions, and logical fallacies - it appears you have an endless supply of stupidity that you come armed with. Good grief man, i'm quite sure you'll be toting Ball Earth till the day you die.

This post was edited by card_sultan on Jan 24 2017 09:55am

and more death throws as you continue to dodge the implications of what you posted. so you agree with a concept, so you had to post a source which talked about the concept, but you dont agree with the mechanisms that the source claims are necessary to legitimize the concept.

wow, that almost sounds like you got caught with your pants down on a source you didnt fully understand and are now claiming you posted it for reasons against what you said before. and its almost as if you were misunderstanding the source still when you claimed it was the picture, and not the actual content of the article, that santara was leaning on in his death blow to you. its almost as if you're continuing this fight with yourself and yourself only, because now youve added another dimension, whether or not you can trust your own words and sources or whether they are symbolic.