More pseudo science being peddled by people that dont know better.

nothing makes more sense than choosing the path that has less evidence obviously.

Even though these 2 telescopes might have a similar construction, if you know in which range Hubble is supposed to acquire data in comparison to Sofia and you take some physics into account then you will realize they can't deliver the same data (quality) if they would take a pic of the same thing.

perhaps you could post the actual raw data for both and then everyone could compare, instead of claiming complete bs that you know how the physics of the two would compare, thats so funny. Infrared light from 1000 years away is so much different than infrared light from 1000 light years + 100 miles - ya i learn that shit in grade 6 science dude, anyone who can't see the difference is a science retard. Oye vah Claiming they take an actual photo really clarifies your understanding is pretty limited to exactly what Nasa wants you to believe.

This post was edited by card_sultan on Aug 31 2016 05:54pm

What is pseudo science?



The man that stands alone is always more right than the herds

Any idea that is not fully certified by those that are paid well to tell you what to think.

i'd like to see you explain this video evidence of orbit.

I got this C_S

Obviously Peter's heart is so magnetically powerful that it's field can lock in objects to orbit no matter the mass.
Just like the earth and moon.




Lmk

stop bailing sultan out all the damn time sir!

i like where your heads at though.

Perhaps you can explain to my why the Book of Enoch says the heavenly bodies orbit but that doesn't mean the Earth is orbiting as well, does it now? But i guess your referring to the nice cgi images the public is feed as some sort of proof?

You probably think satellites are equipped with imax cameras and powered by 0g space rockets too that are stationed to magically capture all the drama, now dont you?



This post was edited by card_sultan on Aug 31 2016 07:54pm