d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Science, Technology & Nature > Monolths
Prev15960616263174Next
Closed New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 14,319
Joined: Jun 19 2010
Gold: 7,271.48
Jan 19 2017 10:13pm
Quote (card_sultan @ Jan 19 2017 09:14pm)
No, your buffoonish assumption would be true if you used the the Standard American Bible where they changed the word firmament to sky,

The firmament is the key word in the King James Version and you trying to not include it and just cherry picking from the entire sentence to just mentioning the part you want to acknowledge, not only reveals your intellectual dishonesty, it clearly shows that regardless of evidence, you will continue with your zombified indoctrinated autonomic diggery pokery assumptions.

Clearly this is a cryptic message and any idiot would clearly know that a man of his intelligence would know the difference between the King James Bible and The New Standard American Bible unlike you.


Wait what.
By including the entire verse Santana is somehow omitting part of it.
Do you even realize when you accuse people of doing the exact thing you are while they or not?
Member
Posts: 63,097
Joined: Jan 11 2005
Gold: 9,765.00
Warn: 60%
Jan 19 2017 10:34pm
Quote (remco6 @ Jan 19 2017 06:13pm)
Wait what.
By including the entire verse Santana is somehow omitting part of it.
Do you even realize when you accuse people of doing the exact thing you are while they or not?


No, he only focused on the first part of the entire sentence and by not including the word firmament he was changing the entire meaning of the sentence. I did not change the meaning of the sentence by talking about the firmament, its one complete thought - he was cherry picking the meaning, it was explaining the meaning, big difference. Thinking the phrase is just talking about the sky is intellectually dishonest.

This is typical strategy for people like him, try to take only partial understanding and apply it to a complete world view and insult people if they dont agree and then report them if say anything back.

This post was edited by card_sultan on Jan 19 2017 10:43pm
Member
Posts: 14,319
Joined: Jun 19 2010
Gold: 7,271.48
Jan 19 2017 11:21pm
Quote (card_sultan @ Jan 19 2017 10:34pm)
No, he only focused on the first part of the entire sentence and by not including the word firmament he was changing the entire meaning of the sentence. I did not change the meaning of the sentence by talking about the firmament, its one complete thought - he was cherry picking the meaning, it was explaining the meaning, big difference. Thinking the phrase is just talking about the sky is intellectually dishonest.

This is typical strategy for people like him, try to take only partial understanding and apply it to a complete world view and insult people if they dont agree and then report them if say anything back.



Nope. Santara quoted the verse in its entirety including the word firmament , you conveniently left out the first half.

This post was edited by remco6 on Jan 19 2017 11:22pm
Member
Posts: 63,097
Joined: Jan 11 2005
Gold: 9,765.00
Warn: 60%
Jan 20 2017 12:41am
Quote (remco6 @ Jan 19 2017 07:21pm)
Nope. Santara quoted the verse in its entirety including the word firmament , you conveniently left out the first half.


Quote (Santara @ Jan 19 2017 03:40pm)
No, the father of rocketry is saying the heavens declare the glory of God, which makes total sense, seeing as his life's work was about reaching the heavens. You're being totally dishonest.


obviously, you have some kind of reading impairment if you see the word firmament in there, the word is not only the most important one in that entire bible verse, to not even mention the proof is intellectually dishonest, changing the meaning of the entire sentence and something only an atheist Nastard troll would do.

This post was edited by card_sultan on Jan 20 2017 12:44am
Member
Posts: 52,224
Joined: Jan 3 2009
Gold: 8,902.00
Jan 20 2017 05:18am
Quote (tard_sultan @ Jan 19 2017 09:14pm)
No, your buffoonish assumption would be true if you used the the Standard American Bible where they changed the word firmament to sky,

The firmament is the key word in the King James Version and you trying to not include it and just cherry picking from the entire sentence to just mentioning the part you want to acknowledge, not only reveals your intellectual dishonesty, it clearly shows that regardless of evidence, you will continue with your zombified indoctrinated autonomic diggery pokery assumptions.


Pinnacle of irony.

Quote (card_sultan @ Jan 19 2017 09:14pm)
Clearly this is a cryptic message and any idiot would clearly know that a man of his intelligence would know the difference between the King James Bible and The New Standard American Bible unlike you.


Right, because a native speaking German is going to be quoting the (at the time of his death) newly released New Standard American Bible on his tombstone. Derp. Know what else he was quoted as saying? Try "The farther we probe into space, the greater my faith."

Quote (card_sultan @ Jan 20 2017 12:41am)
obviously, you have some kind of reading impairment if you see the word firmament in there, the word is not only the most important one in that entire bible verse, to not even mention the proof is intellectually dishonest, changing the meaning of the entire sentence and something only an atheist Nastard troll would do.


Oh right, because I didn't quote it in its entirety a few posts earlier.

Quote (card_sultan @ Jan 19 2017 10:34pm)
No, he only focused on the first part of the entire sentence and by not including the word firmament he was changing the entire meaning of the sentence. I did not change the meaning of the sentence by talking about the firmament, its one complete thought - he was cherry picking the meaning, it was explaining the meaning, big difference. Thinking the phrase is just talking about the sky is intellectually dishonest.

This is typical strategy for people like him, try to take only partial understanding and apply it to a complete world view and insult people if they dont agree and then report them if say anything back.


And now for the headshot:

Quote
fir·ma·ment
ˈfərməmənt/Submit
nounliterary
the heavens or the sky, especially when regarded as a tangible thing.
Member
Posts: 63,097
Joined: Jan 11 2005
Gold: 9,765.00
Warn: 60%
Jan 20 2017 08:25am
Quote (Santara @ Jan 20 2017 01:18am)
Pinnacle of irony.



Right, because a native speaking German is going to be quoting the (at the time of his death) newly released New Standard American Bible on his tombstone. Derp. Know what else he was quoted as saying? Try "The farther we probe into space, the greater my faith."



Oh right, because I didn't quote it in its entirety a few posts earlier.



And now for the headshot:


How intellectually dishonest of you, the firmament is the dome, the French heretic John Calvin proposed the word meant clouds but obviously he was an idiot like yourself and the King James Bible uses the word properly as all ancient people believed the Earth was surrounded by a dome that seperated the Earth from the waters and actually Science has found it but you are probably unaware of it.

http://www.sci-news.com/space/science-impenetrable-barrier-earth-02302.html

And they think this dome creates the static hiss that was originally thought to be the big bang.

“It’s almost like these electrons are running into a glass wall in space. "
said Prof Baker, who is the first author of the paper published in the journal Nature.

Classic dishonesty on your part.
Member
Posts: 7,324
Joined: Dec 22 2002
Gold: 1,261.00
Jan 20 2017 10:51am
Quote (card_sultan @ Jan 19 2017 06:05pm)
That video is just a plane droping a rocket, not Launching a rocket from the ground, and it doesn't even remotely show the satellite, just the rocket and only stage one - i guess on board video footage is to complicated unless they want you to think something in praticular


Oh, so sorry, when you said NASA isn't using rockets to launch satellites I didn't realize that you meant "they aren't using rockets to launch satellites specifically from the ground. They use rockets to launch satellites all the time though". So silly of me, launching it from the ground is completely different, clearly.

Japanese space agency launching from the ground on Dec 13 2016 (streamed live)


This post was edited by russian on Jan 20 2017 10:52am
Member
Posts: 7,324
Joined: Dec 22 2002
Gold: 1,261.00
Jan 20 2017 10:52am
NASA weather satellite launch from the ground on Nov 19 2016


Let's hear your next excuse.

This post was edited by russian on Jan 20 2017 10:52am
Member
Posts: 52,224
Joined: Jan 3 2009
Gold: 8,902.00
Jan 20 2017 11:56am
Quote (Tard_sultan @ Jan 20 2017 08:25am)
How intellectually dishonest of you, the firmament is the dome, the French heretic John Calvin proposed the word meant clouds but obviously he was an idiot like yourself and the King James Bible uses the word properly as all ancient people believed the Earth was surrounded by a dome that seperated the Earth from the waters and actually Science has found it but you are probably unaware of it.

http://www.sci-news.com/space/science-impenetrable-barrier-earth-02302.html

And they think this dome creates the static hiss that was originally thought to be the big bang.

“It’s almost like these electrons are running into a glass wall in space. "
said Prof Baker, who is the first author of the paper published in the journal Nature.

Classic dishonesty on your part.


Who's dishonest here, using a source that clearly identifies a ball Earth while denying a ball Earth?

Checkmate, motherfucker.

This post was edited by Santara on Jan 20 2017 11:56am
Member
Posts: 63,097
Joined: Jan 11 2005
Gold: 9,765.00
Warn: 60%
Jan 20 2017 02:04pm
Quote (russian @ Jan 20 2017 06:52am)
NASA weather satellite launch from the ground on Nov 19 2016
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ezg8HA4AwFY

Let's hear your next excuse.


That's just a 3 seconds of a rocket going off and another minute of telling you what to think- the satellite deploying from the rocket is never shown.


Quote (russian @ Jan 20 2017 06:51am)
Oh, so sorry, when you said NASA isn't using rockets to launch satellites I didn't realize that you meant "they aren't using rockets to launch satellites specifically from the ground. They use rockets to launch satellites all the time though". So silly of me, launching it from the ground is completely different, clearly.

Japanese space agency launching from the ground on Dec 13 2016 (streamed live)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DqLARnODjkc


That actual contradicts the previous shot of the Shuttle launching a satelite when they just opened the doors and it flew out already twirling around
Know the need "the Space arm " to lift it and place it? Wow you must be really thick to not notice the difference - also its not a satellite launch itself from a rocket - like how you think its done

And listen to that commentary, she sounds like she's feigning surprise like when a child opens his gift from Santa at Christmas, I dont speak Japanese but i clearly hear her fake emotion.


Quote (Santara @ Jan 20 2017 07:56am)
Who's dishonest here, using a source that clearly identifies a ball Earth while denying a ball Earth?

Checkmate, motherfucker.


What a surprise - all you see is a fake picture - shoulda known the father of the picture thread in pard would only see and understand that

This post was edited by card_sultan on Jan 20 2017 02:08pm
Go Back To Science, Technology & Nature Topic List
Prev15960616263174Next
Closed New Topic New Poll