adaptation =/= evolution on a macro scale.





even if your premise were true, which it isnt, until you have skeleton i you cant prove with certainty that z came from a.




i read it, and its the most convoluted piece of crap that says absolutely nothing. first it says theres no such thing as a missing link, then it says its been found, then it says theres still holes. is there or isnt there? has it been found or hasnt it?

Every discovery of a missing link creates 2 more missing links or holes, one on each side of the newly discovered link!

Futurama explained it rather well:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b4z6akzMsiM&feature=player_detailpage#t=50

Wow. Mind blown

so are people actually arguing the merits of evolution?

Clearly you have no idea how science works. Evolution seems to work in most cases, it would appear to be the most reasonable explanation for a-z all being slightly different from the previous even if there's a few missing letters. If you have a better solution that explains why there are missing letters or why a and z are similar but aren't related then great, write a paper on it, science likes new ideas.

You can't just say "hey, there's one little detail your theory doesn't 100% explain you should just throw out the whole thing instead of trying to improve it."

On that note I can't believe i bothered to post in this god awful thread I need to go to bed.

is this broscience?

prove it

dumb on purpose^^^