Quote (Derkaderk @ Mar 3 2012 01:52pm)
Okay, but disproving a dissenter on one topic doesn't prove your claims about another topic. Also, Einstein's ideas are integral to quantum mechanics IE the photoelectric effect, so I think citing that he wasn't entirely correct about one facet of quantum mechanics doesn't prove your claim that he was, "wrong about most of quantum mechanics"
In other words, you have yet to show why it's true that quantum mechanics is complete enough to demonstrate that our universe isn't deterministic.
I'd also like to add that I've heard other lecturers (including Leonard Susskind) discuss that given enough information, determinism holds true.
maybe saying einstein was wrong about most of quantum mechanics wasnt accurate
and randomness is part of the copenhagen intepretation:
Copehagen inter. from wikipedia:
"According to the interpretation, the act of measurement causes the set of probabilities to immediately and randomly assume only one of the possible values."
I talked about the randomness of radioactive decay
and you can also read about the bell test experiments