Quote (zeratul87 @ Feb 14 2011 08:01pm)
you're right that observation doesn't require human interaction. however i wasn't trying to claim as such. i was using observation as a thought process as it related to the topic of discussion.
i never claimed that it violated relativity.
young demonstrated the affect of human observation on the wave function of matter. (wave-particle duality)
this has been extended to the above experiment which i have explained. there are several videos out there for people who don't understand. i'm not a teacher.
i haven't read about the group velocity of light however if you're saying that a group size smaller than 30, all together had a speed greater than 30 times the speed of light, that is interesting indeed. i'll have to research that.
I guess the point of my post was to say that even though quantum entanglement necessarily collapses the paired particle when one is "observed," this doesn't really have any practical applications, since there's no way for the universe to communicate that initial collapse to the second particle at faster than the speed of light. So really, while the wave function is
actually 100% going to collapse into a particular state, there's no way for an observer to know that, so from their perspective, there's still a 50% chance of it being in state A vs state B (spin up/down), and when an observation is finally made on the second particle, it seems like it just coincidentally ends up in the state that it must.
That's how I understand it, at least. I'll watch the video now, though. I never had the chance to take a course in advanced quantum, so we never really got very far out of the basics like the infinite/finite square wells, the hydrogen atom, and a few other basic quantum concepts (like the proof that there's no Hidden Variable, and the Heisenberg and General Uncertainty Principles).