I'm not calling you dumb, Stephen Hawking is though.

This would only be applicable if you were smart, which you very much aren't.

what is he then?

go ahead...try to avoid using the word crazy to describe him.

Retarded is an excellent word choice for this situation.

Retarded is a good word for someone who believes everything you learned is school was fully correct and that the Goverment wants to to be completely informed.
I bet your undewear has the stars and stripes on it too?






Get an actual Globe , get a strait ruler and orient your view to how you think perspective works and see who the retarded person is ok?

The only proof you offered was a silly photo from Nasa and demanded I believe it and when I didn't - you flew off the handle like a complete maniac.



This post was edited by card_sultan on Jan 16 2017 07:20pm

Lol!

It blows my mind how hard "relative" is for you. Yes, "up" can be different for different people in different places. "Up" does NOT always have to point in the exact same direction for all people everywhere like you're pretending is the case.



No, not the "only" proof. The "most obvious" proof. Seeing is believing, as they say. It's amazing how I can show you seamless pictures of a ball Earth, yet you can't provide a single picture of the Earth as you pretend it is. I mean, there's always other proofs, but they're clearly too complex for your feeble intellect to wrap your mind around them.

"up" is relative in either direction only in your decrepit old mind, because it's actually flat and you cant understand a 3 d perspective.

Worship your picture, you obviously live in a 2d flatland reality. But if seeing is believing for you, then you should also worship Ewoks.

You cant prove every single picture of an Ewok is fake cgi. So, you're obviously an idiot if you dont believe in Ewoks!



This post was edited by card_sultan on Jan 16 2017 09:01pm

From one totally retarded comment to the next. Keep on marching, Johnny.

Post #567 was retarded, obviously that's something you're much more familiar with , and since pointing out the misunderstanding is too complicated for you - i figured I should just point out the stupid logic you use.