Quote (Neptunus @ Sep 13 2015 06:49am)

When it comes to science, i do agree. Now that information is available to everyone, we have all kinds of people showing off as experts. Take a look at the nutrition/health field, people using few studies they found online to debunk decades of research and acting like visionaries. Doesn't work like that, but in popsci it does.

Quote (Neptunus @ Sep 13 2015 06:49am)

When it comes to science, i do agree. Now that information is available to everyone, we have all kinds of people showing off as experts. Take a look at the nutrition/health field, people using few studies they found online to debunk decades of research and acting like visionaries. Doesn't work like that, but in popsci it does.

Quote (card_sultan @ 13 Sep 2015 19:48)

read more about fission energy:

Chen, Francis (2011). An Indispensable Truth: How Fusion Power Can Save the Planet. New York: Springer. ISBN 978-1441978196
Clery, Daniel (2013). A Piece of the Sun. New York: Overlook. ISBN 978-1468304930
Dean, Stephen (2013). Search for the Ultimate Energy Source: A History of the U.S. Fusion Energy Program. New York: Springer. ISBN 978-1461460367
Molina, Andrés de Bustos (2013) Kinetic Simulations of Ion Transport in Fusion Devices. New York: Springer. ISBN 978-3319004211
Voss, David (March 1, 1999). "What Ever Happened to Cold Fusion". Physics World. ISSN 0953-8585. Retrieved 1 May 2008.
Kruglinksi, Susan (2006-03-03). "Whatever Happened To... Cold Fusion?". Discover Magazine. ISSN 0274-7529. Retrieved 20 June 2008.
Choi, Charles (2005). "Back to Square One". Scientific American. Retrieved 25 November 2008.
Feder, Toni (January 2005). "Cold Fusion Gets Chilly Encore". Physics Today 58: 31. Bibcode:2005PhT....58a..31F. doi:10.1063/1.1881896.
Hagelstein, Peter L.; McKubre, Michael; Nagel, David; Chubb, Talbot; Hekman, Randall (2004), New Physical Effects in Metal Deuterides (PDF), Washington: US Department of Energy, archived from the original (PDF) on January 6, 2007 (manuscript)
U.S. Department of Energy (2004), Report of the Review of Low Energy Nuclear Reactions (PDF), Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Energy, archived from the original (PDF) on 2008-02-26, retrieved 2008-07-19
Goodstein, David (1994), "Whatever happened to cold fusion?", American Scholar (Phi Beta Kappa Society) 63 (4): 527–541, ISSN 0003-0937, retrieved 2008-05-25
Close, Frank E. (1992), Too Hot to Handle: The Race for Cold Fusion (2 ed.), London: Penguin, ISBN 0-14-015926-6
Beaudette, Charles G. (2002), Excess Heat & Why Cold Fusion Research Prevailed, South Bristol, Maine: Oak Grove Press, ISBN 0-9678548-3-0
Van Noorden, R. (April 2007), "Cold fusion back on the menu", Chemistry World, ISSN 1473-7604, retrieved 2008-05-25
Taubes, Gary (1993). Bad Science: The Short Life and Weird Times of Cold Fusion. New York: Random House. ISBN 0-394-58456-2.
Browne, M. (May 3, 1989), "Physicists Debunk Claim Of a New Kind of Fusion", New York Times, retrieved 2008-05-25
Adam, David (24 March 2005), Rusbringer, Alan, ed., "In from the cold", The Guardian (London), retrieved 2008-05-25
Platt, Charles (1998), "What if Cold Fusion is Real?", Wired Magazine (6.11), retrieved 2008-05-25
Hutchinson, Alex (January 8, 2006), "The Year in Science: Physics", Discover Magazine (online), ISSN 0274-7529, retrieved 2008-06-20
Adam, David (24 March 2005), Rusbringer, Alan, ed., "In from the cold", The Guardian (London), retrieved 2008-05-25
Alfred, Randy (2009-03-23). "March 23, 1989: Cold Fusion Gets Cold Shoulder". Wired.

Quote (brmv @ Sep 13 2015 09:33pm)

nice how you started this post with a typical typo :lol:

did you read all of these or is it just (also typical) a cut and paste from some website?

btw, all the papers re cold fusion have nothing to do with hydrogen fusion but many of your posts show that you do not (or cannot) differentiate between the different forms of fusion experimented on

Quote (brmv @ Sep 14 2015 12:04am)

did you even read what is in the list? just the titles?
and yes, hydrogen fusion is a new field
when you were quoting so and so many fusion reactors
they had nothing to do with hydrogen fusion

in case you didn't notice: this thread has "hydrogen fusion" in it's title

note: not writing a formal letter here, so i do not bother with capilisation of words (not even when using other languages on the internet)

Quote (kalelvszod @ Sep 14 2015 12:53am)

Hydrogen fusion we know is possible like many other things we just dont have technology to apply it which is why it is new.there was a movie called chain reaction way bacķ in the 90s doesnt mean it exists :P

Quote (card_sultan @ 14 Sep 2015 05:14)

Here's a video from 1973 where the guys talking about hydrogen fusion - calling it a new technology is total ridiculous:
...

Quote (brmv @ Sep 14 2015 03:05am)

now please come up with a 1973 video on youtube on wormholes to prove that travel by wormholes is an old hat :P