Quote (Azrad @ Oct 7 2013 01:58am)
yeah, (as others have pointed out), the fact that you don't even understand my criticism is quite telling....
Quote (Azrad @ Oct 7 2013 10:22am)
I see we got a new crackpot in the science section...
Quote (Azrad @ Oct 7 2013 11:40am)
User is interested in what you have to say, ask for data/references. Your response:
The hallmark of a crackpot is when they are asked to substantiate a claim, they cry that you need to make their case for them.
Hey man, don't spew that shit here. This section is for intellectual conversation, not dimwitted bs. If you have got a problem with my form of intelligence or articulation form a reason and say it so we can find a solution and get back on-topic.
No one wants to see those shitposts./e
Quote (brmv @ Oct 7 2013 10:32am)
highly interesting what you say there
do i understand right that you consider 3 states: dream-state / asleep / awake?
could you please elaborate on that, ideally with a clear definition of each of those states
also please provide a clearer definition what you mean with 'time is not contiguous'
does that mean 'discrete'? and contiguous or not, is time sequential and/or is there any continuity?
if you could provide any at least minimally reasonable reference as well that would be amazing

No. Do it yourself./e
Time happens one moment after another. This is not directly or indirectly related to your perception of one moment to the next. You are a small percent of the vast universal moment. The time it takes you to lift your finger to type a key has infinite moments between it.
Furthermore, into the aspect of dreaming moments, there is no sound explanation as to when the moments are happening given the state of perception is undefined. Therefore, all the information from your dream-state cannot be simply defined within the hours you and the ones you know acknowledged you were asleep.timeNoun /tīm/The indefinite continued progress of existence and events in the past, present, and future regarded as a whole
con·tig·u·ousAdjective /kənˈtigyo͞oəs/Sharing a common border; touching; next or together in sequence
No matter how in-depth our history books or the Internet record becomes, it will never fully achieved a state in which it knows what happened before, or after the fact.
Therefore, 10,000 years ago could be when events take place next year. There is no way we can truly know in which time has progressed given our momentary field of random conceived perception.
We come into the mental picture roughly 2,000,000 years ago (hazey don't get hung up on that) and if you base that, that's no way possible to have collected information that defines what happened when.
If you think of the phrase "History repeats itself." The Universal age date is accepted currently at 13,770,000,000 years. In this discussion we are basing human perception at 2m in opposition to 13.77b.
How many times could our entire human history have happened within those years? There is absolutely no way we can know whether every single event in our lives, in our past, present, and future have not already happened to the T of perfected similarity. Each time making more and more sense.
Given that one action can have infinite perspectives, everything happening exactly the same over and over could still yield a different universal understanding as to why, what, and so on.
I could go on, but this place has a difficulty with freely expressed ideas without inferior baseless grounding.This post was edited by Immortal0 on Oct 7 2013 09:52am