no they dont, the brane theory has been around for a while and its viewed as plausible
but then again its a big bang in slightly other terms

no1 cares

The expanding of the universe has been veryfied in the last 30 years
the so called Stringtheory and over that the M-theory has advanced alot in the last few years!
thought its is all theoretic physics and can not yet be falsifyed weve achieved many big things through quantum mecanics (Laser,gprs,computerchips..)
those theories give the best explanations and comprehending on how our universe works
but there is yet so much more to explore

no they don't, they'd be glad to be proven wrong.

Bullshit. Explain to me why Alton Harp lost his telescope time when he found evidence that the big bang was wrong.

Halton Arp, sorry.

i already showed you why arp wasnt creditible, why do you keep going back to him?

This post was edited by novocane on Apr 9 2012 08:41pm

op's fuckedd

No, you didn't. That last study that I showed you from Halton Arp.com was done with GOODS, so its redshift is accurate, and it contains two quasars (not galaxies that are similar to quasars) connected to a parent galaxy with wildly different redshifts. Show me some direct evidence that that study is wrong. Maybe even use your own words. I'm interested to see what you can do.

This post was edited by AEtheric on Apr 9 2012 10:40pm

LOL this guy