Quote (skyeye @ Nov 24 2011 12:03pm)
Hmm hasn't it been shown that energy can be used to create matter? And isn't light a form of energy? I am nowhere near being an astro-physicist, and haven't read Einstein's book, but would I be correct in assuming that the vast majority of spce/space-time warping information we have come to know has been amassed by observing black holes?
If that is true, is it not possibble that light DOES have mass, only it is so insignificant that it is virtually undetectable (so low mass that even at light speed it does not have enough energy to cause any physical movement) and is only affected to a noticeable degree by infinite gravity?
As I said, I am not particularly well versed in such things, and cannot fully understand how time could travel faster in one area than it could in another. I am almost definatly wrong in assuming this, but it would seem to me that if you took a pocketwatch anywhere in the universe , it would always tick at one of our earth seconds for each second shown.
But anyway, try not to be too rude when ya tear me a new ass, I don't make it a habit of discussing matters such as this :/
well time and space are stuck together in a sense, so when you think about massive objects displacing space, you can think about displacing space as stretching out time
and we've actually observed this phenomenon without black holes. if you put an atomic clock at a high altitude and another at a low altitude, they'll tick off from each other. by nanoseconds, but still within the error
This post was edited by Derkaderk on Nov 24 2011 12:42pm