Quote (Caedus @ Oct 17 2011 11:34am)
Thats not what people are arguing. It's the complex stuff that people say is impossible, that can't possibly be true. That's whats being refered to. Science is every changing and as we advance we'll come to realize many things we deemed impossible are possible.
at no point did i say that was what people were arguing ( the part where i say " try and use it to argue " should be enough to understand that )
rather , what i am saying is , that you can make generalizations until you are blue in the face , but translating that to a specific argument is an entirely different thing
nowhere do you actually specifically critique anything at all , merely a broad generalization , that may or may not have any relevance
bentherdonethat gave 2 specifics ( satellites and gps ) , as to why our understanding on this matter is good , both of which rely on the equations of relativity
its not that i dont agree with you to a certain extent ( i can name many famous cases ) , or that i dont expect many notions we currantly have will one day be replaced with new ideas
but to extend a generalization , carte blanche , to every situation , is essentially sloppy thinking