d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Science, Technology & Nature > How F@cked Up Is Acedemic Science?
Prev145678Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Views: 1378Replies: 74Track Topic
Member
Posts: 13,578
Joined: Jul 27 2010
Gold: 2,285.00
#51
Jan 17 2011 03:59pm
Quote (Aisu_aS @ Jan 17 2011 03:07pm)
Wouldn't be surprised tbh, but the "its just a theory" argument always causes me rage. :(

I really don't think he is. He writes much longer responses than what he's given. If he's a troll, then he's doing it wrong. You're supposed to post very little while evoking maximum responses from your target. For example, see how much he wrote in post #33 compared to the two lines I had written :P
Member
Posts: 33,701
Joined: Jul 17 2006
Gold: 1,990.00
#52
Jan 17 2011 05:20pm
Quote (bentherdonethat @ Jan 17 2011 01:59pm)
I really don't think he is. He writes much longer responses than what he's given. If he's a troll, then he's doing it wrong. You're supposed to post very little while evoking maximum responses from your target. For example, see how much he wrote in post #33 compared to the two lines I had written :P


and yet he turned this thread from an actual intellectual thread to a 'OMG JUST A THEORY LLOLOLOL' and 'OMG ITS NOT "JUST A THEORY" /RAGEEEEE' thread

you act like theres a certain way to troll. hes either an idiot who wont be persuaded or a troll whos running train on you clowns.

This post was edited by Kamikizzle on Jan 17 2011 05:21pm
Member
Posts: 14,823
Joined: Aug 23 2005
Gold: 2.90
#53
Jan 17 2011 05:39pm
Quote (Kamikizzle @ Jan 17 2011 07:20pm)
and yet he turned this thread from an actual intellectual thread to a 'OMG JUST A THEORY LLOLOLOL' and 'OMG ITS NOT "JUST A THEORY" /RAGEEEEE' thread

you act like theres a certain way to troll. hes either an idiot who wont be persuaded or a troll whos running train on you clowns.


I'd rather be trolled hard online as opposed to having an irl troll running around proclaiming it's "just a theory, not a fact". I rofl even as I type that quote.

This post was edited by Black487 on Jan 17 2011 05:39pm
Member
Posts: 1,118
Joined: Sep 20 2010
Gold: 251.01
#54
Jan 17 2011 09:26pm
Choo Choo
Member
Posts: 13,578
Joined: Jul 27 2010
Gold: 2,285.00
#55
Jan 17 2011 11:50pm
Quote (Kamikizzle @ Jan 17 2011 06:20pm)
and yet he turned this thread from an actual intellectual thread to a 'OMG JUST A THEORY LLOLOLOL' and 'OMG ITS NOT "JUST A THEORY" /RAGEEEEE' thread

you act like theres a certain way to troll. hes either an idiot who wont be persuaded or a troll whos running train on you clowns.

This thread wasn't intellectual right from the get-go. Did you watch the video?

Quote (corpselooter1 @ Jan 17 2011 10:26pm)
Choo Choo

At least you can pretend you were trolling.
Member
Posts: 5,628
Joined: May 29 2006
Gold: 5.00
#56
Jan 18 2011 01:58am
Quote (Kamikizzle @ Jan 17 2011 05:20pm)
and yet he turned this thread from an actual intellectual thread to a 'OMG JUST A THEORY LLOLOLOL' and 'OMG ITS NOT "JUST A THEORY" /RAGEEEEE' thread

you act like theres a certain way to troll. hes either an idiot who wont be persuaded or a troll whos running train on you clowns.


Any idiot can post stupid shit, then when they lose the argument they can claim trolling to save face. Tbh i can believe that he believe his. Had a HS teacher once equate a Theory to a hypothesis then told me i didn't know what i was talking about when i corrected him ~.`
Member
Posts: 7,903
Joined: Apr 1 2008
Gold: 1,050.00
#57
Jan 18 2011 02:24pm
nerds
Member
Posts: 11,857
Joined: May 9 2008
Gold: 0.00
#58
Jan 18 2011 08:26pm
Quote (Aisu_aS @ Jan 16 2011 09:33pm)
Since the religious seem to be born with the inability to understand the definition of Scientific Theory; I'll once again explain it for you.



You See, 1 and 2 is what is classified as an scientific theory. 6 and 7 is what your talking about, or the everyday use of the word Theory. Before commenting on science, take your head out of your bible and learn something useful. Your ignorance is laughable.

Also included below is a picture, in case you fail to understand the definitions provided.

http://img713.imageshack.us/img713/2851/1209218084351.png


this is exactly what ive been saying big bang cosmology is, its a religion! thnx for clearing that up to everyone

Quote (AEtheric @ Jan 16 2011 09:29pm)
Here's something interesting that invalidates the view that redshift is purely a distance/speed relation.

http://www.thunderbolts.info/tpod/2004/arch/041001quasar-galaxy.htm


yes, there are countless instances of this, if there was only a few the big bang theory could write it off as coincidence, but becuase theres so many, and they still try to deny it, is when people should start getting suspicious

i loved this quote
Quote
About the new observations, one cosmologist said, "If astronomy were a science, this paper would mean the end of the big bang." Instead, the paper was scarcely noted when it was presented to the American Astronomical Society meeting in January 2004. When submitted to an astronomical journal, heavy editing was recommended by the peer review committee. And now it sits with the editor, awaiting permission for publication. And waiting. And waiting.



This post was edited by elitepie on Jan 18 2011 08:31pm
Member
Posts: 13,578
Joined: Jul 27 2010
Gold: 2,285.00
#59
Jan 18 2011 09:55pm
Quote
About the new observations, one cosmologist said, "If astronomy were a science, this paper would mean the end of the big bang." Instead, the paper was scarcely noted when it was presented to the American Astronomical Society meeting in January 2004. When submitted to an astronomical journal, heavy editing was recommended by the peer review committee. And now it sits with the editor, awaiting permission for publication. And waiting. And waiting.

It's very rare to get a paper accepted for publication the first time it's submitted. Journals almost ALWAYS require heavy editing before they'll publish something, which is something a lot of people apparently aren't aware of.
Member
Posts: 5,628
Joined: May 29 2006
Gold: 5.00
#60
Jan 18 2011 11:57pm
Quote (elitepie @ Jan 18 2011 08:26pm)
this is exactly what ive been saying big bang cosmology is, its a religion! thnx for clearing that up to everyone



yes, there are countless instances of this, if there was only a few the big bang theory could write it off as coincidence, but becuase theres so many, and they still try to deny it, is when people should start getting suspicious

i loved this quote


You need to go back to 5th grade if you can't recognize the Scientific Method.



This post was edited by Aisu_aS on Jan 18 2011 11:58pm
Go Back To Science, Technology & Nature Topic List
Prev145678Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll

© 2003-2026 d2jsp  Contact