I believe in all things in moderation.

While I do agree that the average person consumes too much meat, many of the vegetarians I have know have ended up with health problems/obesity as a direct result. The health findings of vegetarianism are a lot of marketing and partisan half truths compared to honest results.

Still, the land use is a problem and from that perspective I do believe it is immoral to consume large animal meat, such as beef, with frequency (anything more than once a week seems a bit gluttonous). Chicken and fish concern me quite a bit less in this capacity.

you need your fats and proteins. if you dont agree with the way that the livestock is handled/raised, go live in the jungle and fend for yourself. do the bear griles thing.

i bet your health would improve ten-fold.

stop eating foods derived from corn.

This post was edited by Gps on Jul 18 2010 03:55am

wall
of
text
that
i
will
say
that
i
read
but
we
both
know
i
didnt
because
i
am
not
a
vegetarian
lmk
yo
supsupsup

Which can be derived from sources other than meat.

lots of vegetables looks like a penis so most of the male population doesn't want to eat them therefore most of the female population buys them for "dinner" when hes at work.

/thread

eat bugs if you're so anti-meat.

Okay Freud.

Eating meat, in itself, is not the problem, although it does have health problems associated with it. If I saw an animal dead on the road, and it wasn't killed for it's meat and died by being hit by a car or something, then I would have no problem eating it's meat. It's the fact that people are killing sentient beings for consumption that I find wrong.

would you eat another human that wasn't killed for its meat?

Of course.