You dont have enough understanding of the facts to explain or comprehend them.

What speed is the satellite traveling at when it is 100 feet above the rock?

What speed is the satellite traveling at when it is actually landed on the rubber ducky rock?

The fact you can't even answer this most basic question is but a window into your understanding.

This post was edited by card_sultan on Oct 4 2016 07:31am

do you understand what "speed relative to another object means"?

to give you an example you can ponder on:
take the passenger in a train close to the equator
the train travels at 100 km/h and the passenger walks in he train in the direction the train travels at 5 km/h
how fast is the passenger moving?

do not forget that the speed of earth rotation at the equator is 460 m/s
and the speed of earth rotation around the sun is 30 km/s
also the solar system travels at an average speed of 230 km/s around the galactic centre
our galaxy moves at ...

seems the passenger walks pretty fast according to your logic

This post was edited by brmv on Oct 4 2016 08:06am

So you failed at answering my question, typical hypocrite.

The passenger has a speed of 5 km if he is moving because he is inside a closed environment.

If he sits down, he will be moving at 0 mph relative to the speed of the train. Relative to the still earth - he is moving at 100kph but those forces of that motion are stored kinetically because like i said that speed is relative to the the train.

This is how I think your thinking - since in the Helio model the earth is orbiting the sun at 66, 600 mph - an airplane need to speed up 66,600 mph and then it will be be able to make a pillow soft instantaneous landing on
rotating spinning orbiting ball earth and then we can do away with runways......

This post was edited by card_sultan on Oct 4 2016 09:04am

the speed relative to the comet was 1 m/s at impact in case you did not know
do you understand what that means?
i doubt that very much

No, i actually understand your crazy logic , you think since the comet was going 84,000 mph - you think something that simply sped up to 84,000mph could land on that rock

Cause that's the way it works here on Earth right - Earth is orbiting at 66,600mph - so an airplane must speed up to 66,600 mph since its relative to the speed of the orbiting ball and only then will it be able to make instantaneous pillow soft landings and we will have no more need for runways.

You dont have an understanding of actual physics, you have an understanding of comic book physics.

This post was edited by card_sultan on Oct 4 2016 09:34am

Still incapable to differentiate between outer space environment and atmospheric environment.

Bang bang shots fired

You think it's possible because you've seen it in comic books. In this scenario, the speed of the comet is 84,000 miles relative to the sun because that is what it's orbiting, the satellite is not orbiting the sun - it just needs to go 84,000 mph on its own volition to catch up with it. In order for it to be at a state of rest, sitting on the comet - it would need to change speed to 0 mph. Normally you need a runway to release that kinetic energy that has built up to come to rest. But since superman can do it - a human spacecraft can do it right - because space is just like being superman! right? There is no need for kinetic energy release for objects moving at incredible speeds in space, right? You saw it in a comic book and it was confirmed by a sci-fi movie - so who could doubt that?

This post was edited by card_sultan on Oct 4 2016 01:32pm

Dude just tell the rest how it happens dont be make us beg lmao

I know a shit bout that

thanks for proving again to everyone that you have no clue whatsoever
but in your favour is you have stated over and over that you don't understand gravity
please stay with those nutcase blogs of scientific illiterate people
and leave this thread alone