More word salad. For starters phi (golden ratio - 1) is a constant, not an interesting function, so the phrase "a constant of phi" is gibberish. Bonus points: the Larmor frequency is a function that depends on a lot of stuff, so this whole notion is just crazy pants.

That isn't even dimensionally correct. In what? bananas per hour? Furthermore this is written in a very odd way, almost as if you are copying from someone and you don't know how to deal with exponents...

OK that might be the dumbest thing ever posted in the science section. I know there is a lot of competition out there, but you really hit this one into crazy town. I think anyone who went to gradeschool can spot the problem with that statement.

Here I discovered you've been writing phi instead of Phi, but it doesn't fix any of the previous problems. Anyway: Phi^(-3) is an irrational number, yet 85/360 is a rational number, so again, this must be false (remember I posted a proof of this).

Same problem, but this time it is more obvious. Here you have a rational number equaling an irrational number!

My insecurities? okay sport. /pats on the head

Please continue embarrassing yourself.



This post was edited by Arsenic_Touch on Jul 29 2016 01:35am

Well if you couldn't figure out what my objection is from my first answer then I don't know how we should continue to discuss.
And if you already know how that thing is constructed and you still don't see what I mentioned...

I give you a hint: several light sources, light scattering

I'm not going to put it over time, that would contaminate a pure equation. There is no dimension to this aspect.
1=360, i no go 2 grade skull i no comprehend that 1 is a place holdr 4 circle when we bout to divide it up
ahahaha phi instead of Phi. You tell me about word salads. phi negative cube is the shape difference between a hard angle and the feild therein. You need to pull your head out of the drugs man, I know your people love shrooms milk & honey.


1/phi cubed = 0.2360679775 woooOOOOooo scary
360/phi cubed = 85 INCONCIEVABLEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE






Or I could stop since the circular reasoning is beyond finished.






Cute attempt at mockery, the only one embarassed is you because Flat earth is all you can think about, even though this thread has nothing to do with it.
Fitting gif, jew shame from your jew idols




Oh hints, that's neat. I can bend a single light source across the top of a magnet through a prism.
You're going to need a real objection still.



y'allll are fuckin' desperate.

This post was edited by MaliceMizer on Jul 29 2016 03:18am

As I thought. It's useless to discuss...
You just don't want to understand because that answer just shows me that you did not even try.

That picture was rather convincing until

Light has speed
Radiation is poison
Does calculus
Sun in cancerous

All are most definitely true and rather easy to test at that

Phi = (1 + √5)/2

Phi^3 = 2 + √5

360/Phi^3 = 360/(2 + √5) = 360(2 - √5)/(-1) = 360√5 - 720

You'll notice:
360√5 - 720 ≠ 85


Well let's take that as an axiom and see where that leads us with some basic algebra:

1 = 360
1 - 1 = 360 -1
0 = 359
0/359 = 359/359
0 = 1

From here is it easy to make any number equal 0, for example:
0 = 1
0 * π = 1 * π
0 = π

With your axiom, any number can be shown to equal 0, therefore all numbers equal all other numbers!

Perhaps this explains why you crackpots keep contradicting yourselves!

You're dropping "hints" in an attempt to trap me in my confidence.
"Useless to discuss" is something from a child would say to an adult with regards to defending their favorite TV show,
Not someone with a skeptical mind.











/facepalm 1=360 degrees is not an axiom.
You just tried to cut a 5 part equation into a small segment then said "behold, this whole thing must be wrong!"

You're splitting golden heirs.

chromium alloy not detected!