d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Science, Technology & Nature > Close Encounter With Comet 67p > May Reveal Origins Of Life On Earth
Prev1404142434451Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 63,097
Joined: Jan 11 2005
Gold: 9,765.00
Warn: 60%
Sep 28 2016 08:24pm
Quote (Subwoofer @ Sep 27 2016 08:50am)
speed is relative.




Landing on Earth didn't work so well without a runway, why do people think we can land on a rocky meteor?
I guess if Nasa makes a picture with an arrow on it, people think it's plausible. :rofl:

Quote (caswallen @ Sep 27 2016 07:05pm)
landing is just a matter of matching the comets speed though, I don't understand the question? ok so first you have to close the distance between you and the comet, by moving faster... then you let up on it to match its speed and carefully land on it... so both i guess? speed up then slow down before you crash into it?


matching the comet's speed? - ok how did they do that weren't they traveling toward it - so how did they reverse direction and then match the speed of the flying rock?

R

This post was edited by card_sultan on Sep 28 2016 08:31pm
Member
Posts: 32,985
Joined: Mar 17 2005
Gold: 6.00
Sep 28 2016 08:29pm
Quote (card_sultan @ Sep 28 2016 09:24pm)
https://d1o50x50snmhul.cloudfront.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/dn26809-2_800.jpg

Landing on Earth didn't work so well without a runway, why do people think we can land on a rocky meteor?
I guess if Nasa makes a picture with an arrow on it, people think it's plausible. :rofl:


atmosphere vs no atmosphere.
Member
Posts: 63,097
Joined: Jan 11 2005
Gold: 9,765.00
Warn: 60%
Sep 28 2016 08:35pm
Quote (Subwoofer @ Sep 28 2016 04:29pm)
atmosphere vs no atmosphere.


so you think smashing into a rock going like 25,000 mph and a satellite going 25,000 mph , the speeds will just cancel each out, wow how profoundly stupid.
Member
Posts: 32,985
Joined: Mar 17 2005
Gold: 6.00
Sep 28 2016 08:38pm
Quote (card_sultan @ Sep 28 2016 09:35pm)
so you think smashing into a rock going like 25,000 mph and a satellite going 25,000 mph , the speeds will just cancel each out, wow how profoundly stupid.


you are aware that space travel isn't like an airplane right? you can be going 25000mph and sit down as soft as a feather as long as your trajectory is worked out so that the object and your spacecraft are moving slowly relative to each other.

ever drove beside another car going 65mph and felt like it'd be easy to hand something out the window to the other car and it go perfectly fine? its the same principle except you don't have to worry about the 65mph air stream between the two objects in space.
Member
Posts: 63,097
Joined: Jan 11 2005
Gold: 9,765.00
Warn: 60%
Sep 28 2016 09:00pm
Quote (Subwoofer @ Sep 28 2016 04:38pm)
you are aware that space travel isn't like an airplane right? you can be going 25000mph and sit down as soft as a feather as long as your trajectory is worked out so that the object and your spacecraft are moving slowly relative to each other.

ever drove beside another car going 65mph and felt like it'd be easy to hand something out the window to the other car and it go perfectly fine? its the same principle except you don't have to worry about the 65mph air stream between the two objects in space.


so if an object is traveling towards a speeding rock it's going in the opposite direction? - ever passed an object to a car going in the opposite direction? Hopeful not because you might not have an arm anymore.
Member
Posts: 32,985
Joined: Mar 17 2005
Gold: 6.00
Sep 28 2016 09:05pm
Quote (card_sultan @ Sep 28 2016 10:00pm)
so if an object is traveling towards a speeding rock it's going in the opposite direction? - ever passed an object to a car going in the opposite direction? Hopeful not because you might not have an arm anymore.


bold: i like how you come up with stuff that has nothing to do with previous responses.
Member
Posts: 63,097
Joined: Jan 11 2005
Gold: 9,765.00
Warn: 60%
Sep 28 2016 09:10pm
Quote (Subwoofer @ Sep 28 2016 05:05pm)
bold: i like how you come up with stuff that has nothing to do with previous responses.


It has everything to do with pointing out your delusions and impossible improbable cartoon physics. You're not even beginning to think critically, you just blindly accept things Nasa says and are angry if someone does not.
Member
Posts: 32,985
Joined: Mar 17 2005
Gold: 6.00
Sep 28 2016 09:12pm
Quote (card_sultan @ Sep 28 2016 10:10pm)
It has everything to do with pointing out your delusions and impossible improbable cartoon physics. You're not even beginning to think critically, you just blindly accept things Nasa says and are angry if someone does not.


nope it doesn't you just turned all the logical stuff i said around into the opposite and then ask why it doesn't work....well because you turned it into the opposite of what i explained for some reason.
Member
Posts: 63,097
Joined: Jan 11 2005
Gold: 9,765.00
Warn: 60%
Sep 28 2016 09:16pm
Quote (Subwoofer @ Sep 28 2016 05:12pm)
nope it doesn't you just turned all the logical stuff i said around into the opposite and then ask why it doesn't work....well because you turned it into the opposite of what i explained for some reason.


wow, i see your beyond any type of Spatial intelligence.
Member
Posts: 32,985
Joined: Mar 17 2005
Gold: 6.00
Sep 28 2016 09:29pm
Quote (card_sultan @ Sep 28 2016 10:16pm)
wow, i see your beyond any type of Spatial intelligence.


i keep forgetting that ignoring key points like trajectory and relative speed in my post and making up some crap about opposite directions makes you smart.

why you think anyone would try to head on an asteroid at a wildly different relative speed shows how goofy your mind is.
Go Back To Science, Technology & Nature Topic List
Prev1404142434451Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll