I'm still waiting for your reasoning as to why you think the light at the end of the hall is below the floor.
Must be one topsy turvy world you live in , I can almost understand how you fail to properly process almost every piece of information you encounter.

Also still waiting for the reason / source you think gravitys speed is 9.8 m/s

You must be new here. Card's elite status in PaRD exempts him from having to back up his arguments.

Nope, I'm well aware of his intellectual dishonesty.
I certainly don't expect an answer.
I guess watching him spin himself in circles and corners of logic amuses me.

I suppose it amuses more than just you because I also continue to partake even though I'd probably have better luck teaching my 1 year old physics at this point.

In the Hall the light, is on the ceiling because it is static and fixed and close

The sun is below the water plane because it is moving, not fixed and 300x further away than optical horizon of the completely flat water, the water is not raising up physically, the sun is not setting physically.


And my point about the Cavendish experiment was that it doesn't prove Big "G" and it doesn't show the relation of little g on more than 2 objects - because g is fake.

This post was edited by card_sultan on May 24 2017 04:04pm

Show him the globe - your child is now an indoctrinated Genius, you probably tell him about Santa Claus and other lies to, what a good dad you are....



This post was edited by card_sultan on May 24 2017 04:10pm

That explains the difference in temperature at best (well, math needs to be done for that, but much like you cbf to ever reply to anything in this thread at all, I cbf to learn how to do the math and then show you how to do the math), but nothing more than that.

/
Source:
New Scientist. 2/6/2016, Vol. 229 Issue 3059, p25-25. 2/3p.
Document Type:
Interview
Subject Terms:
*CONSPIRACY theories
*EARTH (Planet)
*PSYCHOLOGISTS
Company/Entity:
BARNARD College
People:
BROTHERTON, Rob -- Interviews
Abstract:
An interview with Rob Brotherton, a psychologist at Barnard College in New York Citym is presented. When asked about his views on the thinking that the Earth is flat, he explains that the human brains have cognitive biases that make one prone to seeing real or imagined conspiracies. Brotherton believes that conspiracy theories tend to distrust received wisdom. He also shares his views on the negative impact of not trusting wisdom
Full Text Word Count:
541
ISSN:
0262-4079
Accession Number:
112726766
Database:
Academic Search Premier

This post was edited by Forg0tten on May 24 2017 04:15pm

I don't care about your picture of the sun setting unless it's beside another picture of the midday sun. Then explain why the rather minuscule difference in viewing angle as the sun travels around me would cause it to appear to go below the horizon and such a drastic difference in visual perception in defiance of mathematical reality.

Your justifying your belief by using the the belief as justification. Are you actually unable to see this or is circular logic all you have?

@ second part
By using a claim that no-one ever made with a number that doesn't even have the proper units attached to it ?

This post was edited by remco6 on May 24 2017 04:58pm

Here's my mad paint skillz. This is flat Earth seen from the side. The sun's orbit, according to you, is the yellow line. At no point in the sun's path does it pass below horizontal.



Here's the results of triangulation:

http://www.calculator.net/triangle-calculator.html?vc=&vx=&vy=3000&va=&vz=6210&vb=90&angleunits=d&x=74&y=10

...where 90° is the angle straight up to the sun at the equator, 3,000 miles is YOUR asserted altitude for the sun, and 6,210 miles is the distance from the north pole to the equator, assuming 69 miles per degree of latitude. Therefore, from the north pole, the sun can never (assuming it orbits the equator roughly) be less than 25° above the flat horizon.

Dude thats a 2d side view just like i said it was - and your like no no no it isn't, is that the lying or the stupidity that's worse here, your worse that a child my god.

I so called this: look at the graphic i made yesterday



Anytime it dawns on you is cool, but hopefully it'll be soon.

Why are these two pictures different?

Should 2 d side view drawings incorporate the "inevitable" and "incontrovertible" sloping floor?



This post was edited by card_sultan on May 24 2017 07:37pm