A forward momentum doesn't require a force. It actually implies the opposite, an object in motion tends to stay in motion unless acted on by a force. You should review the laws of motion, because you just made such a fundamental mistake I know for a fact you have no knowledge of physics.

On the subject though, 10$ says it doesn't pan out

it came from my freed, later foubd other sites but cant edit on this site

Lay off the drugs

gravity doesn't exist but a constant upwards velocity explains the flat earth model of why things fall.

I wonder how many mental hoops you have to travel through for this to be reasonable.

I already explain that that was a Vsauce statement that actually pertains to cube theory and is not part of flat earth / geocentric model

so if you wanna bitch - you can find that moron on Youtube.

this

accelerate
[ak-sel-uh-reyt]
Spell Syllables
Examples Word Origin
See more synonyms on Thesaurus.com
verb (used with object), accelerated, accelerating.
1.
to cause faster or greater activity, development, progress, advancement, etc., in:
to accelerate economic growth.
2.
to hasten the occurrence of:
to accelerate the fall of a government.
3.
Mechanics. to change the velocity of (a body) or the rate of (motion); cause to undergo acceleration.
4.
to reduce the time required for (a course of study) by intensifying the work, eliminating detail, etc.
verb (used without object), accelerated, accelerating.
5.
to move or go faster; increase in speed.
6.
to progress or develop faster.

Again we have a misunderstanding of English where Acceleration has a different/special meaning in use in Mechanics/Physics where essentially it means an object moving.
In Cube theory, if the earth is travel up in space, Thor misinterpreted this as Constantly Accelerating which would mean in a few years he thought it would be going a Trillion of miles an hour

[QUOTE=Thor123422,Jun 6 2016 11:57pm The force isn't pushing the air, so after a while the air pressure from an Earth moving trillions of miles per hour should crush us.[/QUOTE]

Of course this is simply not the case and thinking it would be , questions any actual scientific learning, because even in the Heliocentric model , the Earth is constantly travelling around the sun at 66,600mph and that doesn't mean it's going to be going a trillion mph soon.

Actually - Constant force would imply a consistent movement or "acceleration" - not that the object would be constantly accelerating. Or how bout I word it like this - An accelerating force would imply the object is constantly increasing in speed.

a constant force would imply the object would be constantly accelerating

/e what is causing the force due to gravity in the flat earth model?

This post was edited by majorblood on Jun 23 2016 11:26pm

A few months ago he was arguing that the Earth experiences/creates gravity (but was arguing that rocks do not). Now he argues that the Earth doesn't have gravity. He's trolling.