imperial evidence isnt real enough for you?

why are stupid people so god damn stupid.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tAvzsjcBtx8

dr.masari emoto.

google him tard.

This post was edited by Anphrax on Sep 24 2013 05:46pm

number one...its empirical evidence not imperial evidence.

number two...i know who that joke is. he claims shit...tells no one any details...tries to make money off the pseudoscience crowd with it.

he's a joke and not a real scientist.

the problem with arguing with stupid people is, its hard enough to get through their thick skull with any new ideas, then you have to do with their huge ego's that they can't admit they are wrong.

i did say 'for those smart enough to use this' in title didn't ?

are you implying that the scientific community refuses new ideas? lmfao you are a moron if you think that. the different with this is he's claiming this shit and then trying to make money off it..not further science.

you sir are a grade A+ ignorant sucker for thinking this is anything more than nonsense.

i don't think you're capable of new ideas without deleting old ones. your brain has the storage space of a floppy disk and the reasoning of a 2 yr old

life is gonna get tough kid get rdy for the slam

ya...i'm going to take life advice from the guy that came up with "imperial evidence".

i thought doomchaser was bad...but holy christ you brought a whole new level if ignorance to this subforum.

and that's why he doesn't want any peer review because he has no peer in the scientific community, but

Writing about Emoto's theory in the Skeptical Inquirer, physician Harriet A. Hall concluded that it was "hard to see how anyone could mistake it for science"

we have in this thread the proof that harriet hall forgot to add after 'anyone' the phrase "with any thinking capacity" or "unaffected by mind altering substances"

this thread clearly doesn't belong here but in gc