Why is there no time??
There's no time for an external observer, not for the person traveling at c.



But that is exactly what I just said:



What are you not understanding?


Also show me said tests that prove it in reality.

Because you related ideologies with laws of physics.
Which both are in total different paragraphs and have no connection whatsoever.

Parents ideologies have got nothing to do with laws of the universe as you call them man.

no, time doesn't exist for the person traveling at c


and


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hafele%E2%80%93Keating_experiment

relativity is very real, whether you choose to accept it or not. GPS satellites and high speed airplane clocks all have to be synchronized for it


and you can see the mass effects in cyclotron accelerators

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cyclotron#Relativistic

youre the one who related the two

here do some math:



what happens when v = c?

What are you linking? A paragraph of words?
That test you gotta pay to have access from what I can tell.

Can you please link me a test that you actually read yourself? Or at least that I can read without paying?






You did, see?
And try to be more coherent in your replies.



It DOES exist.
Travel at the speed of light then come to stop and the clock will show exactly the same time as yours.
Not when it's moving at the speed of light and you try to measure it.
Prove me wrong please.

Light/speed of light only affects obvservers.



That link doesn't work.



lol hilarious how basic you can be
I've already explained why they need to do it in this thread, please read for better understanding.
Its got nothing to do with special relativity, its very simple.

Again, time dilation exists in between 2 particles not in the same momentum.
Sattelites are not in the same momentum as you or their receivers.

Their clock is adjusted every second or so, its not a constant clocking speed.
Speed doesnt affect time of the object itself which is traveling.

This post was edited by omghacks2 on Feb 4 2012 01:35pm

Do you actually know anything about that equation?
That is used for the observer WHILE the particle is moving.

It doesn't tell you anything about when a particle comes to a stop.
It doesn't tell anything about the time a particle is registering on itself.

It uses "time" in its own meaning of word as a constant. Or assumes it.

On a side note: It could even be applied by the particle itself towards you and pretending the particle was nuts, she could think that you were the one moving instead.

This post was edited by omghacks2 on Feb 4 2012 01:45pm

Just google time dilation experiments. It's really not hard

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/relativ/airtim.html

This post was edited by Derkaderk on Feb 4 2012 02:23pm

Those tests have got nothing to do with speed. Or Einstein's speed of ligth theory.

But anyhow (talking about time dilation anyway),
Im septic about those results, matching their calculations that well out of nanoseconds difference, when a they had to fly up to the correct altitude first, and that would be influencing the results already according to their theory. And many other things they didn't even mention about the flight that could influence results, like the planet electromagnetic field.
There's just too many factors that could influence an inaccurate flight like that, especially on the gravitational test.

I'll have to go ahead and assume those results as fake for the sakes of being famous (for example)

Now back to where we were, what makes YOU believe that speed of light nulls time?



This post was edited by omghacks2 on Feb 4 2012 03:00pm