The human body cannot go acidic enough in the stomach to "properly" digest meat anyways. Our bodies are just not designed to eat meat. I'm not a vegetarian or vegan, I'm an alkalarian, if you so wish to give it a name. 95% of the population have been eating wrong there whole lives, and yes this includes vegans and vegetarians because they're doing it wrong too. They can function the way I do but they would have to go through a detox process which would vary by individual depending on the level of toxicity built up in the tissues.

And yes, I'm sorry but cancer does strike at the weakest link in the body, it has nothing to do with a gene or protein. If you want to believe this, then that's fine, spend the next 20-50 years of your life researching where all the other drug scientists are in the FDA. We need more chemo-kill-me-therapy methods anyways.

the human body is more designed to eat smaller game, bird, fish if we eat meat. cow meat is like eating lead.

You're right we can digest things like fresh water salmon and other marine foods fully, but for the most part we cannot fully digest most meat. I guess I should have been more specific.

For the small bird part, if you're talking about things like chicken and turkey, well they might be easier to digest and more lean, but I would have to disagree, meat such as chicken and turkey still get stuck in our small intestines and begin to rot in our intestinal villi and our micro villi, as well as our colon.

This post was edited by DieTryin' on Aug 9 2011 10:27pm

People interested in this look up Dr. Burzynski

Human's stomachs wouldn't be acidic if eating meat wasn't favored by nature. Its just most meat in the US is raised improperly and unethically in factory settings, which DOES affect its digestibility; I'll give you that, but only that. Less industrialized and more sustainable farms have no issues as far as I'm concerned.



Splitting hairs =\

wat

apple

go eat a steak than comeback

DieTryin, please disclose your disease with us.

There are many diseases that will go in remission when diet is changed drastically (many of them being metabolic diseases), and thus there would be a great explanation why this diet has 'cured' you. If you wish for other people to follow your doctrine, be open with your information, so that your hypotheses can be tested and proven (or not).

Now you're just another nut claiming things without anything backing it up. If you actually know of peer-reviewed articles concerning this issue, please post them. For example, an article in Science, Nature, The Lancet. You could try finding them on Pubmed or in the National Library of Medicine, but I'm pretty sure nothing would come up.

On Dr. Young, the person who he graduated under, Dr. Bradford, has been convicted of conspiring to violate federal food and drug laws and defrauding individuals seeking medical care. ( http://www.quackwatch.org/04ConsumerEducation/Nonrecorg/cfcm.html )

Dr. Young himself has accelerated, if not directly caused, the death of at least one person, Kim Tinkham ( http://digitaljournal.com/article/301197 ). Dr. Young himself has already been charged with multiple felonies, he has even pleaded guilty to a misdemeanor charge of attempted practice of medicine without a license. He also moved to California because the laws are more lenient there for medical frauds.

I used to eat steak, one of the dumbest things someone can do next to drinking alcohol and consuming dairy products.



The disease I used to have is personal, I'm sorry but I've kept it that way for a while, and I'd like to still keep it like that.

Disease only goes into remission when you "bully" it with things like drugs, etc, you're not gonna go into remission when you get all the toxicity out of your body, which I spent 4 months doing, I like to post, debate, and educate people, but if they don't want to follow then that's fine. This regimen has been proven hundreds and thousands of times already.

I'm the nut? Wait, who's the one living an unhealthy lifestyle here? Who are the people with disease and cancer? Who are the people giving birth to offspring that have or will have disease and cancer early in life? Who takes drugs to treat "symptoms" of disease rather then the cause? These are the nuts. You will never find how to reverse chronic illness in a drug book. If you want "scientific evidence from a "medical" standpoint" then go follow the corrupt FDA, I could care less.

You really don't get it do you? Defrauding individuals from seeking "medical care"? These people wouldn't even be sick or need "medical care" if they didn't consume such shit food and drinks there whole lives, shit food that the FDA promotes and allows as a standard.

Dr. Young did not cause the death of Kim Tinkham, or accelerate it, he has done nothing wrong. He moved to California because the laws are more lenient towards "alternative medicine", you know, where you don't eat shit foods for 30 years to make yourself chronically sick, then take drugs for the rest of your life to live another 10-20 years? Not "medical frauds", now I know your whole post is nothing but bullshit seeing how you twisted those words around.

if those things were cured, the health industry would not be so big and full of deceiving puppets