Quote (d2iaf @ Dec 29 2010 02:10pm)
science doesnt consist of theories either because any1 can make any theory
Some random kids random theory about something is not in any way shape or form the same thing as a formal scientific theory. Actual scientific theories undergo a lot of testing and peer review before being generally accepted as theory. Just because something isn't a scientific LAW does not mean it isn't science.
Quote (d2iaf @ Dec 29 2010 02:46pm)
btw heres 5 evidence against evolution.
1. evolution needs a big bang otherwise it doesnt work. - big bang cant happen for many reasons, one being that if it was a spinning dot as they say, every galaxy, planet and sun should be spinning in the same direction (conservation of angular momentum)
http://csep10.phys.utk.edu/astr161/lect/solarsys/angmom.html , another being the fact its impossible for nothing to explode and create everything all by itself (action-reaction-cause-effect).
2. life has never been observed to appear from lifeless rock
3. no1 has ever seen a positive mutation that would lead to macro-evolution.
4. recorded human history only leads back to about 4 thousand years go, if modern man is 400,000 years old y have we started writing/recording so late?
5. The oldest fossils already found are of fully formed beings and show now transition from one to another.
good luck
1. What the hell does the big bang have to do with evolution? The big bang is a theory describing the origins and development of the universe as a whole. It largely deals with things such as protons, electrons and smaller particles as well as the development of galaxies and large structures in the universe. (also... the big bang theory doesn't say jack about how existence exploded out of nothing. it simply tries to explain the evolution of the universe after those first couple billionths of a second.) Evolution is focused entirely on describing the development and diversity of the many species on this planet.
2. I suppose this is true. A handful of planets/moons that we have barely explored is certainly proof that its impossible for life to form under the proper conditions with out some kind of higher being's involvement. I've never won the lottery either so i'm pretty sure it's impossible...
4. What is the oldest piece of paper you have with your own writing on it? Were you not growing and developing before this scrap of paper with a scribble was created?
5. I'm not that well informed about the fossil record but just because we don't have a fossil from every single generation between us and monkeys or birds and dinosaurs doesn't mean this link doesn't exist. Fossil's are extremely rare, for all the many many millions of species that have ever lived on the planet we have a very low % of their fossils.
Quote
-yes matter of development, look at how fast we've developed in the past 100 years ;) and ur telling me for 398,000 years humans just ran naked all day and had no discoveries? (theyr modern man, not ape man, which means same brain capacity). and if u think that they didnt advance because they had no need of it is totally illogical, need does not cause u to advance, discovery has nothing to do with need, u discover things without even trying. a 400,000 year period without any discoveries is completely illogical to me and is totaly untrue. did jesus need a chrysler back then? is that y we have one nowadays? because people before needed it? is that really what lead to the discovery? or was it a chain of discoveries one after the other, making new technology possible?
Have you ever heard of exponential growth? Look at how fast our species has changed in the last 100 years compared to the previous few thousand years. Pretty amazing isn't it.
Today the majority of the worlds population can access global news minutes or hours after it happens and talk to anyone else with access to a computer almost anywhere on the planet. A couple hundred years ago it took weeks or months to get news about the rest of the world or to send a letter a couple thousand miles. A couple thousand years ago you would likely never receive any information in your entire lifetime on the happenings of the world just a few hundred miles away.
We've gone from using basic tools made of stone and bronze for hunting to creating more advanced devices and using animals for farming and agriculture. Now in the past century we've developed complex devices and machinery to gather our food thousands of people at a time.
The growth and technology curve starts out slowly. Why would you expect the same growth rate in technology for the last hundred years as you would expect in the last 2,000, or 400,000. It's pretty difficult to create new things and discover technologies when the extent of your math and science knowledge is "myself and my tribe will die if i don't bring them enough food."