d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Science, Technology & Nature > Ancient City Destroyed By Atomic Blast
Prev1345
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 13,578
Joined: Jul 27 2010
Gold: 2,285.00
Dec 28 2010 10:02am
Quote (d2iaf @ Dec 27 2010 02:28pm)
found sulfur balls in sodom = proves sulfur rained in that city.... how hard is that to understand

btw those sulfur balls are near 97.5% sulfur which is not found anywhere else on earth so they must have came from outside the earth

still gonna ignore the evidence/proof?

Native sulfur is pure sulfur. http://www.galleries.com/minerals/elements/sulfur/sulfur.htm
The presence of near-pure sulfur somewhere isn't proof of anything. Historically, nearly all of the sulfur used in industrial processes was harvested from native sulfur sites. Only in the more modern times have we started getting sulfur from hydrocarbons because sulfur compounds are a natural byproduct of oil refining, so it's cheaper to get it this way than to mine it specifically.
Member
Posts: 737
Joined: Feb 1 2010
Gold: 0.00
Dec 28 2010 10:34am
Quote (bentherdonethat @ Dec 28 2010 11:02am)
Native sulfur is pure sulfur. http://www.galleries.com/minerals/elements/sulfur/sulfur.htm
The presence of near-pure sulfur somewhere isn't proof of anything. Historically, nearly all of the sulfur used in industrial processes was harvested from native sulfur sites. Only in the more modern times have we started getting sulfur from hydrocarbons because sulfur compounds are a natural byproduct of oil refining, so it's cheaper to get it this way than to mine it specifically.


maybe u didnt read the article i put up there but let me explain it to you simpler.

"The walls and the cities were all completely turned to ash"


"a worker picks up a chunk of wall and easily crushes it"


"The balls themselves were composed of pressed pure powder sulfur. Checking with volcanic experts around the world confirmed that no where else in the world, even around volcanic activity, were any balls of this composition found.
When the balls had fallen from heaven, they were estimated to be around 5,000 degrees Celsius (or around 9,000 degrees Fahrenheit). After consuming everything that was around them, the heat continue to melt the ash that had formed around them, vitrifying (turning to glass) the ash. Thus the balls were surrounded by a glassy casing of melted and re-solidified ash."


"Some what were thought to be gold coins were found. However, upon analysis, it was found that the coins had been turned into gold salts. The heat had literally burned up the gold in the coins turning them to gold ash."

:)
Member
Posts: 13,578
Joined: Jul 27 2010
Gold: 2,285.00
Dec 28 2010 12:49pm
Quote (d2iaf @ Dec 28 2010 11:34am)
maybe u didnt read the article i put up there but let me explain it to you simpler.

Maybe I should explain something to you more simply. That's not a scientific article. If it were, there would be some reference to published, peer-reviewed scientific work. Since there isn't, it reeks of religious contamination of the results.
Member
Posts: 737
Joined: Feb 1 2010
Gold: 0.00
Dec 28 2010 09:04pm
Quote (bentherdonethat @ Dec 28 2010 01:49pm)
Maybe I should explain something to you more simply. That's not a scientific article. If it were, there would be some reference to published, peer-reviewed scientific work. Since there isn't, it reeks of religious contamination of the results.


its obviously science but ppl dont accept it like u because they are not willing to believe it....
:mellow:

also "cherrypicking"

This post was edited by d2iaf on Dec 28 2010 09:05pm
Member
Posts: 13,578
Joined: Jul 27 2010
Gold: 2,285.00
Dec 28 2010 10:36pm
Quote (d2iaf @ Dec 28 2010 10:04pm)
its obviously science but ppl dont accept it like u because they are not willing to believe it....
:mellow:

also "cherrypicking"

Like I said, it's obviously not a scientific article, which is something you've likely never seen before. You're arguing something that you know nothing about, and you don't even know that you don't know about it, thus compounding your ignorance. Furthermore, I'm not sure you know what the term "cherry picking" means.
Member
Posts: 737
Joined: Feb 1 2010
Gold: 0.00
Dec 29 2010 03:24pm
Quote (bentherdonethat @ Dec 28 2010 11:36pm)
Like I said, it's obviously not a scientific article, which is something you've likely never seen before. You're arguing something that you know nothing about, and you don't even know that you don't know about it, thus compounding your ignorance. Furthermore, I'm not sure you know what the term "cherry picking" means.


i think ur more familiar with ignorance than i am ;) ^_^

but yea that is scientific fact and u just dont want to accept it because it leads to believing in god and religion but be ignorant and ul see where it takes you ;)
Member
Posts: 17,071
Joined: Aug 5 2008
Gold: 29.00
Jan 6 2011 08:39pm
Quote (d2iaf @ Dec 29 2010 04:24pm)
i think ur more familiar with ignorance than i am ;) ^_^

but yea that is scientific fact and u just dont want to accept it because it leads to believing in god and religion but be ignorant and ul see where it takes you ;)


1. (Directed to D2iaf) Do not bring religious into a technology and other stuff forum.

2. Do not think for JUST a SECOND that we are the first set of homosapiens to walk the Earth or to be able to build civilizations, it is possible they could have done this. I am not saying they did or they didn't, just saying it is completely possible.
Member
Posts: 13,578
Joined: Jul 27 2010
Gold: 2,285.00
Jan 6 2011 08:59pm
Quote (d2iaf @ Dec 29 2010 04:24pm)
i think ur more familiar with ignorance than i am ;)  ^_^

If that's true, it's only because I'm aware that I've been conversing with someone who's keeping it all to himself.
Go Back To Science, Technology & Nature Topic List
Prev1345
Add Reply New Topic New Poll