Quote (Topher_Laid @ Tue, Oct 20 2009, 08:07pm)
.. yes, and just like a child, if you ask enough why is the sky blue questions eventually the answer is I dont know or nothing. That is the nature of everything so your statment is meaningless.
Lol, my statement is not meaningless. You are putting a philisophical question next to a "scientific" question. The question why is the sky blue cannot be compared to "where did all the matter come from?"
Quote
You missed my point.. my point was is life can survive in every envirionment imaginable (except a vaccum), and thorugh globe-wide catastrophies, why is it so far fetched to think that life sprang out of early Earth environment??
Because global catastrophies and every other environment already has preexisting life. Not only that, but after the global catastrophies life could still survive because there is still a place where life can be sustained. In early Earth, there is no preexisting life since we are talking about the beginning of life. Not only that, but the environment would be unsuited for life to dwell in.
Quote
... ahhhh actually you didnt prove shit.. you pointed something out, but the Earth is considered to be a closed system. I dont know how many times I have to inform you that your wrong, atleast about that... I dont give 2 shits about your view-point when real scientists say that Earth is a closed system. if you would like to discuss the semantics of that, I'd be happy to. But I think this situation has boiled down to an immovable object meeting an unwaivering force.. we are going back and forth to nowhere..
And again, just because scientists (Who they are I do not know. How many scientists I do not know.) say Earth is a closed system does not mean that it is. I just proved that the Earth is an open system and yet you
still negate it without any evidence to support your claim except "oh, because scientists say so." I do not know how many times I have to prove you wrong.
Quote
No I did consider it and gave you a bonefide rebuttle. simply put there was no oxygen in the Early Earth atmosphere, and early organisms respirated carbon-dioxide
But no oxygen still leads to major problems. (I have mentioned this before and I think it was ignored).
Quote
I dont understand where you get the idea that you wrote the guidelines to life.. YES these are LAB organisms, but the FACT is that they CAN live! This means that another organism that was adapted to it's environment could have lived with less than 20 amnio acids. that is the POINT, and you can't argue that because they DO live. And to neglect that fact and just say "aww yea but they could only live in a lab" is simply retarded.
No, it is not. You are putting an organism in an environment where it is not natural and think that same logic applies to a place where nature is the overall thing that controls the environment.
Quote
I am not under any gun, just setting the record straigght so there is no confusion on shit. Im not the one here walking around with the all-mighty attitude. I just find it amusing that you are so quick to judge and inform me of how wrong I am.
Uh, yes you are. You came up with the topic and hold it to be true. I am simply criticizing it. And what do you mean "walking around with the all-mighty attitude?" What, I cannot criticize something that is wrong? Just like if I said the Earth was flat; you would come and criticize me about it. I just find it amusing that you like to assume a lot.