d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Science, Technology & Nature > How Did Existance Come Into Existance?
Prev13456Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Views: 1234Replies: 58Track Topic
Member
Posts: 20
Joined: Aug 12 2009
Gold: 0.00
#41
Aug 14 2009 08:15am
existence*

Um, I think the big bang occurred first. Planets and stars formed. Primordial soup and shit. Prokaryotes. Eukaryotes. Multi-cellular organisms. Oceans to land transition. Mammals. Humans.
Member
Posts: 9,692
Joined: Apr 10 2006
Gold: 19,597.59
#42
Aug 14 2009 02:53pm
shut up
Member
Posts: 24,100
Joined: Oct 5 2004
Gold: 199.18
Warn: 10%
#43
Aug 14 2009 03:23pm
If you were to get an answer to your question what usefulness would it bring to you?
-Buddha
Banned
Posts: 14,474
Joined: Apr 20 2007
Gold: 13,284.01
Warn: 40%
#44
Aug 14 2009 07:35pm
Quote (dothe @ Thu, May 14 2009, 11:56pm)
bovine is right it has been proven there is a finite amount of mass/energy in the universe. stabilized ofc by its conceptual counterpart dark matter. a bit of logical deduction should lead you to this conclusion even without researching it. infinite is INFINITE and like bovine said, this implies that everything everywhere would be consumed by matter or energy. how would u explain the void of space where the particle count per cubic meter is in the 100's?

however i dont agree with bovine on the idea that the universe always existed. there's plenty of researched evidence that shows the universe is expanding. this implies only one conclusion; that it must have a physical provenience. perhaps i misinterpreted your theory and you believe the universe existed as a singularity for an eternity before the big bang...but i dont think thats what u meant. i suppose thats more rational, but still it presents a huge logical fallacy. because how would it exist unchanging for an eternity and then suddenly ignite into the vastness it is now? and if there is no origin to the universe, there is no origin to time, and so how could time have a direction? better yet how could time exist at all? if something has absolutely no effect on anything that defines the physical universe, then it must be a fictitious invention. but we all know time exists dont we?


The only thing I disagree with here is your quote "...the universe existed as a singularity for an eternity before the Big Bang".

Before the Big Bang, there was no time. Time is measured as an interval between 2 events (any type of events). There were no events before the Big Bang; therefore, there was no time.
Member
Posts: 11,446
Joined: Feb 19 2006
Gold: 1,706.36
#45
Aug 15 2009 03:21pm
Which came first, the chicken or the egg?
Member
Posts: 3,343
Joined: May 25 2009
Gold: 0.00
Warn: 10%
#46
Aug 15 2009 04:10pm
Quote (stacked @ Thu, May 14 2009, 08:24pm)
Also due to the fact the 3D universe is mathematically infinite in all directions, therefore there is an infinite amount of matter/mass/energy.


Ok so then what made the 3D universe exist?
That is the point he is trying to make.

All of you are absolutely retarded.

Quote (tetrisLblock @ Fri, Aug 14 2009, 09:15am)
existence*

Um, I think the big bang occurred first. Planets and stars formed. Primordial soup and shit. Prokaryotes. Eukaryotes. Multi-cellular organisms. Oceans to land transition. Mammals. Humans.


What made the big bang exist?
Things don't just blow up out of no where. Something had to cause it, thus something had to exist.

This post was edited by AshBabe on Aug 15 2009 04:10pm
Member
Posts: 5,901
Joined: Dec 13 2005
Gold: 2,508.53
#47
Aug 16 2009 02:35am
Quote (H911ADA @ Mon, Jul 6 2009, 11:22pm)
Big Bang Theory = Bible's Creation story


God said it and Bang! it was there?
Member
Posts: 145,872
Joined: Mar 30 2009
Gold: 28,628.04
#48
Aug 16 2009 09:42am
it just is
Member
Posts: 2,281
Joined: Nov 17 2008
Gold: 1,932.00
#49
Aug 16 2009 10:21am
It makes sence that existence is real. Think about this: how can there be inexistence without existence? The two concepts define eachother. It is impossible for there to be simply nothing, because really, "nothing" is only the lack of something. There cannot be one without the other.
Member
Posts: 3,343
Joined: May 25 2009
Gold: 0.00
Warn: 10%
#50
Aug 16 2009 02:46pm
Quote (Mjehehe @ Sun, Aug 16 2009, 11:21am)
It makes sence that existence is real. Think about this: how can there be inexistence without existence? The two concepts define eachother. It is impossible for there to be simply nothing, because really, "nothing" is only the lack of something. There cannot be one without the other.


Thank you for this unrelated post.
Go Back To Science, Technology & Nature Topic List
Prev13456Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll

© 2003-2026 d2jsp  Contact