d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Science, Technology & Nature > Monolths
Prev13839404142174Next
Closed New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 38,458
Joined: Aug 24 2007
Gold: 97.00
Oct 4 2016 05:44pm
Quote (card_sultan @ Oct 4 2016 05:20pm)
I assume you're talking about the refraction that is suppose to happen in atmosphere. So how would the convex lense of the atmosphere make light diverge and not focus itself? You should probably do some research into how light reacts to lenses and not be so ignorant and just think you can mention a word without understanding what it means.


I find it funny that you acknowledge the atmosphere and still preach a flat earth

Which one is it man?
Member
Posts: 63,097
Joined: Jan 11 2005
Gold: 9,765.00
Warn: 60%
Oct 5 2016 06:11am
Quote (Asexual @ Oct 4 2016 01:44pm)
I find it funny that you acknowledge the atmosphere and still preach a flat earth

Which one is it man?


when referring to the joke Heliocentric Model, they call it the Atmosphere , (Atom-sphere) because of Atomism + Ball Earth Retardation theory - so words appropriate to the model being discussed seem applicable and on target.

you know its funny, after 60 years of astro-science trying to do vertical landings and having it completely fail - dont you think its funny that Elon Musk's Space X program got it done? What do you think he figured out that Nasa couldn't

and why do you think they blew up his rocket right after he completed this impossible task? You know it was just sitting there right, it was suppose to take off for another test in a few days.



Even if you watch SpaceX's failed attempts at vertical landing - it shows that the theory of gravity and why we think things fall to earth is not completely correct as you think theories are 100% accurate, true and unchangeable.

This post was edited by card_sultan on Oct 5 2016 06:16am
Member
Posts: 46,792
Joined: Oct 24 2009
Gold: 18,285.00
Oct 5 2016 09:16am
That god damn ufo from the moon landing picture is still around shooting them invisible rockets left and right... :fume:

What did ur cousin at MIT have to say on the matter? :rofl:

Btw, is he a flat earther too? :rofl:
Member
Posts: 63,097
Joined: Jan 11 2005
Gold: 9,765.00
Warn: 60%
Oct 5 2016 10:09am
Quote (luckspin @ Oct 5 2016 05:16am)
That god damn ufo from the moon landing picture is still around shooting them invisible rockets left and right... :fume:

What did ur cousin at MIT have to say on the matter? :rofl:

Btw, is he a flat earther too? :rofl:


There are no ufos on the moon cause we never went. And really what would they be doing there- build moon sand castles?

He is actually a she but nice reading comprehension and assumption that only men can be smart.

We are all geocentrists subconsciously, but anyone in her position know it's career suicide to even to discuss such sacrilege. ;)

But it goes along with your Modus Operandus - let other people you consider smarter than you tell you what to believe.

This post was edited by card_sultan on Oct 5 2016 10:13am
Member
Posts: 46,792
Joined: Oct 24 2009
Gold: 18,285.00
Oct 5 2016 01:03pm
Quote (card_sultan @ 5 Oct 2016 19:09)
There are no ufos on the moon cause we never went. And really what would they be doing there- build moon sand castles?

He is actually a she but nice reading comprehension and assumption that only men can be smart.

We are all geocentrists subconsciously, but anyone in her position know it's career suicide to even to discuss such sacrilege. ;)

But it goes along with your Modus Operandus - let other people you consider smarter than you tell you what to believe.


whats the point of me deliberately saying "he" if u already wrote its a "she"... i just couldnt care to remember the gender of however many cousins u listed in ur post relating to what they studied or what their occupation is.

gender doesnt even relate to my question and even if it did, it would imply that men r stupid for believing that Earth is flat and not women.

thx for showing me yet again how u'd go out of ur way to make an assumption based on no sufficient evidence, flat earther in a nut shell.

so anyone in her position (a scientist) would know that its a suicide to discuss flat earth theory? why would that be? arent the flat earth CEO's scientists? :rofl: ofc they r not, makes sense :thumbsup:


Member
Posts: 63,097
Joined: Jan 11 2005
Gold: 9,765.00
Warn: 60%
Oct 5 2016 01:43pm
Quote (luckspin @ Oct 5 2016 09:03am)
whats the point of me deliberately saying "he" if u already wrote its a "she"... i just couldnt care to remember the gender of however many cousins u listed in ur post relating to what they studied or what their occupation is.

gender doesnt even relate to my question and even if it did, it would imply that men r stupid for believing that Earth is flat and not women.

thx for showing me yet again how u'd go out of ur way to make an assumption based on no sufficient evidence, flat earther in a nut shell.

so anyone in her position (a scientist) would know that its a suicide to discuss flat earth theory? why would that be? arent the flat earth CEO's scientists? :rofl: ofc they r not, makes sense :thumbsup:


Couldn't care to remember or was it just a failure to distinguish the details because your blinded by the facts and only see things that agree with your bias?

Since it was like a half hour after i posted - you might have forgotten, but i like the second reason and is much more plausible.
Member
Posts: 4,113
Joined: Sep 28 2006
Gold: 16,240.00
Oct 7 2016 01:58am
Quote (luckspin @ Oct 3 2016 08:38pm)
oh no, i was typing on the phone where i couldnt care to spell check unlike the auto spell check on the computer (which of course u've never used i bet) :cry:

1 more L, a missing R and a click error between U and I is absolutely terrible for a non-native English speaker, forgive me!

i envy ur sentence structure almost as much as ur perfect spell checked writing :rofl: its a shame that basic spell checkers dont correct ur sentence structure too :wallbash:

What's wrong with blew up? I think your argument just completely blew up. And while saying 'the fuck out of' isn't normal it was done for dramatic effect and is fine.
The rest was pretty bad though, although the main problem was the drawn on sentence.

My english is bad also so i shouldn't complain
Member
Posts: 46,792
Joined: Oct 24 2009
Gold: 18,285.00
Oct 7 2016 08:43am
Quote (dakariii @ 7 Oct 2016 10:58)
What's wrong with blew up? I think your argument just completely blew up. And while saying 'the fuck out of' isn't normal it was done for dramatic effect and is fine.
The rest was pretty bad though, although the main problem was the drawn on sentence.

My english is bad also so i shouldn't complain



I was highlighting his poor sentence structure (especially the repetition of "even" and "blew up" twice in a single sentence)

Sometimes when i read his posts i feel like a 15 year old is talking to me.
Member
Posts: 63,097
Joined: Jan 11 2005
Gold: 9,765.00
Warn: 60%
Oct 7 2016 03:03pm
Quote (luckspin @ Oct 7 2016 04:43am)
I was highlighting his poor sentence structure (especially the repetition of "even" and "blew up" twice in a single sentence)

Sometimes when i read his posts i feel like a 15 year old is talking to me.


Sorry I dont have perfect sounding English to you like you see on tv, but at least i dont criticize someone for theirs while they make multiple grammar, spelling and word choice errors, that's something a 15 year old does.

Didnt you do that, that's right you did, but dont worry because i wont judge you - i know you're just a kid. But if you have perfect sounding English - maybe you should start working on your TV career, I think you'll like the attention.

This post was edited by card_sultan on Oct 7 2016 03:06pm
Member
Posts: 63,097
Joined: Jan 11 2005
Gold: 9,765.00
Warn: 60%
Oct 8 2016 03:01pm
Bj's explained....

Go Back To Science, Technology & Nature Topic List
Prev13839404142174Next
Closed New Topic New Poll