Study coming from California

huhu

http://austides.com/wp-content/uploads/Steffen_et_al_PNAS_2018.pdf

Did you even bother reating it?

Yeah and the US is #2 efforts to reduce emissions.
India is 4th, with the 15% of the worlds population, and dead last in emission reduction efforts.

Also, the US has SHIT loads of people compared to tiny frenchlands.

-e



This post was edited by Ep0ch on Sep 8 2018 05:34pm

It's not an argument, we measure it by inhabitant.. and if the US people recently burned less, its because they dont have money after economic crisis.

It's nowhere near "efforts" or trump's politic. You still have fatass that needs around 400 liters of water everyday to be washed.

And france isn't even on the 20 first, I guess you lose again nerdy



Currently humanity cuts trees 3 times faster than they repel, fish faster than they breed, pump aquifers faster than they replenish, emit more CO2 and more greenhouse that carbon sinks do not capture, etc.

This post was edited by Melatonina on Sep 8 2018 09:42pm

You offer zero proof to substantiate any of what you claim.

Yes. How about you ? did you ?

In the future, the Earth System could potentially follow many
trajectories (12, 13), often represented by the large range of
global temperature rises simulated by climate models (14)

Earth pathway
around 2 °C above preindustrial temperature). Beyond thisthreshold, intrinsic biogeophysical feedbacks in the Earth System
(Biogeophysical Feedbacks) could become the dominant processes controlling the system’s trajectory.

The so-called “greening” of the planet, caused by enhanced
plant growth due to increasing atmospheric CO2
concentration (31), has increased the land carbon sink in recent decades (32).
However, increasing atmospheric CO2 raises temperature, and
hotter leaves photosynthesize less well. Other feedbacks are also involved — for instance, warming the soil increases microbial respiration, releasing CO2 back into the atmosphere.

You can't even read your own langage ? Holy uneducated american.

I just named an U.S. study that shows cascade effects and point of no return soon acquired.

You're unable to understand. You fail.

That's not reading, that's copy and pasting.

Globally, almost 400 billion is being invested into renewable resources. as of 2018.
Additionally, the US hopes to have a combined 1 trillion+ by 2030 with private investors.
https://acore.org/acore-sets-investment-goal-of-1-trillion-by-2030-for-u-s-renewables/

https://energyinnovation.org/2018/01/22/renewable-energy-levelized-cost-of-energy-already-cheaper-than-fossil-fuels-and-prices-keep-plunging/


-e

From 2017; https://www.energy.gov/fy-2017-department-energy-budget-request-fact-sheet
From 2018; https://about.bnef.com/blog/clean-energy-10-predictions-2018/



This post was edited by Ep0ch on Sep 8 2018 10:06pm

What's wrong with it ? Cause they back up my words ?

You asked for studies and proofs and such, and when you get served you just dodge.

I am still waiting for your "proofs" that there is no global warming. I am really curious to see something other than youtube coming from your lazy nerd ass.
So far you've been only able to cite Al Gore which also back up my claims as he worked with GIEC on the matter. Did you read GIEC's study conclusions at least ? Or cant you read at all ?

U.S. invested 44 billions in 2016, at least that's the numbers I've found.

Considering they were burning the most just few years back I guess it's fair to say they had to make the biggest efforts first ?

This post was edited by Melatonina on Sep 8 2018 10:03pm

Everything you say is wrong.